在manhattan论坛上看到的一段评分描述，发过来给大家参考

kingapple25

蓝色部分是工作人员的回答

also would like to ask the experts: In this verval part I thought I did it really good, but at the end I finished with a 34. I got wrong questions number 7,8,12,14,17,18,22,24,25,31,34,37,38,39,41

(At the end I was obviously runnig out of time so I had to more or less made a guess. I read through the questions really fast).

I got the first 6 right, which I think it should have boosted me to a high level, and actually the questions have been quite hard during the whole exam (that is why I runned out of time). And then I havent fail many questions in a row, actually my errors are spread trough all the exam, getting 3 correct answer and 2 wrong, or similar that I thought it will keep improving my performance smoothly. So when I saw the 34 I was very dissapointed, I thought I was going to get arround a 38 or so.

As for your scoring questions, I have two thoughts. First, there is basically no benefit to answering the first 6 questions correctly if you are unable to work relatively accurately through the entire section. I am not sure who created or perpetuated this myth about the early questions, but answering them correctly is only beneficial if you are then able to continue to correctly answer those questions above your "ability level" throughout the remainder of the test. If not, your score will regress, especially when you miss 5 of the final 6 questions (as you did). Second, the number of questions you answer correctly, though important, is not vital to your score. What truly matters is which questions you answer correctly. To achieve your goal score you must answer most of the questions below this difficulty level correctly. If you are inconsistent with questions of a difficulty below your "ability level," you will never rise to a point that places you firmly within your desired range.

原贴地址：http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/as-the-former-chair-of-the-planning-board-for-18-consecutive-t842.html