[求助]大全d-5 6 15

WhiteScarf

這是從國外網站上看到的答案 寫的不錯 大家參考參考

A) The constitutional rights of criminal defendants should be protected.


        This is the assumption which the author
supprts in the line "Although its purpose is laudable,......" (the
purpose here is protection of defendants)
        

        

(B) Most cases in which the exclusionary rule has been invoked have
involved purely technical violations of constitutional principles.

        this is not assumed (or the author doesn't
care to assume this specific detail on how many were technical or how
many were other)
        

        

(C) The number of cases whose outcome has been affected by the exclusionary rule is significant.


        This is the basic assumption/fact considered by the author as significant enough to point it out (by writing about it).
        

        

(D) Some of the defendants set free under the exclusionary rule have been guilty of serious criminal offenses.


        this is assumed by the author as the significance of the exclusionary rule.


specified in the line "guilty have been set free, perhaps to steal, rape, or murder again. "
        

        

(E) Merely technical violations of the rules concerning evidence should
be treated differently from deliberate assaults upon human rights


        This is not an assumption but a wish by the author
        

        
between B & E , I go with B as its presence /absence doesn't
make any impact. Even without the point assumed in B, the passage is as
complete as now.


        

ans B.