ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it. That plan is ill-conceived: if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders. On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires. And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.

In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?

正确答案: D

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3221|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD18 Q20

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2010-9-11 21:59:41 | 显示全部楼层
“And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability. ”
最后这句话是什么意思呢?

哪个NN能帮忙写一下这个题的逻辑主线?我怎么看到on the other hand后面就开始晕了呢!

2楼版主说的  
“文章只是认为一开始的一个plan不对,并从两种情况来分析,那个plan是不对的

最后提出有其他的办法实现”    这个我不理解,最后提出有其他办法实现是指什么办法?怎么实现?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-6-7 23:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部