请教狒狒逻辑一题,THANKS!

SuJie0481010

Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument

(A) relies on information that is far from certain

(B) confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution

(C) inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts

(D) inappropriately employs language that is vague

(E) takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds

我觉得应该选A,因为COMMISSIONER 认为THE PLAN 一定会起作用，所以不是应该是 relies on information that is far from certain 吗？

谢谢！

SuJie0481010

有谁能具体解释一下呢? 谢谢了!

SuJie0481010

感谢感谢!