ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Ecologist: The Scottish Highlands were once the site of extensive forests, but these forests have mostly disappeared and been replaced by peat bogs. The common view is that the Highlands' deforestation was caused by human activity, especially agriculture. However, agriculture began in the Highlands less than 2,000 years ago. Peat bogs, which consist of compressed decayed vegetable matter, build up by only about one foot per 1,000 years and, throughout the Highlands, remains of trees in peat bogs are almost all at depths great than four feet. Since climate changes that occurred between 7,000 and 4,000 years ago favored the development of peat bogs rather than the survival of forests, the deforestation was more likely the result of natural processes than of human activity.

In the ecologist's argument the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4714

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2128|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

天山9-32

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-2-9 18:34:00 | 显示全部楼层

两句BF都是具体数据,因此都是evidence,先排除position选项CDE。
再看两句的关系,两者相结合才能得出ecologist的观点——与人类活动无关。两句相辅相成,缺一不可,所以第二句在论述中不是被用来反对第一句的,排除A。

最后看一眼B确认一下: 第一句在第二句衬托之下为ecologist的观点(同时也是对另一种观点的反对)提供了后盾——正确。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-29 10:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部