今天距离一战已经8个月过去了,本来期待能够有更好的分数,但是或许太在乎了,也没能有太好的发挥,勉强上了700,最可惜的和8月4日得710的MM一样,这次数学的scale score只拿了50分.
分享JJ的大部分是大牛,我的成绩虽然不是那么牛,但是也希望回馈一下这里无私share的TX们,但是由于分数有限,也怕给大家太多误导,再加之姐姐的记性确实也不大好,能贡献的有限,请各位见谅!
Verbal: 写作:issue,学校应该提倡更多地教s&t, 更少地教arts&humanities 阅读 1、农业的起源:jj上的那篇 2、宇宙星云的形成:有道题不是太确定,问作者认为atom和构成dust的particle相比如何,纠结了半天,觉得好像答案都不太对,大家定位在首段,认真读一下,尤其是正确理解dust的定语,再形成比较! 3、还有一篇GWD的原题,就是AFL在1938年为何改变其对待全民健康保险的立场这篇,但问题稍微有些变体,大家注意AFL到底在哪一年之前就已经开始改变立场了,肯定是在1938年前,甚至还在1935年前就已经改变了。 In 1938, at the government-convened National Health Conference, organized labor emerged as a major proponent of legislation to guarantee universal health care in the United States. The American Medical Association, representing physicians’ interests, argued for preserving physicians’ free-market prerogatives. Labor activists countered these arguments by insisting that health care was a fundamental right that should be guaranteed by government programs. The labor activists’ position represented a departure from the voluntarist view held until 1935 by leaders of the American Federation of labor (AFL), a leading affiliation of labor unions; the voluntarist view stressed workers’ right to freedom from government intrusions into their lives and represented national health insurance as a threat to workers’ privacy. AFL president Samuel Gompers, presuming to speak for all workers, had positioned the AFL as a leading opponent of the proposals for national health insurance that were advocated beginning in 1915 by the American Association for Labor Legislation (AALL), an organization dedicated to the study and reform of labor laws. Gompers’ opposition to national health insurance was partly principled, arising from the premise that governments under capitalism invariably served employers’, not workers’, interests. Gompers feared the probing of government bureaucrats into workers’ lives, as well as the possibility that government-mandated health insurance, financed in part by employers, could permit companies to require employee medical examinations that might be used to discharge disabled workers. Yet the AFL’s voluntarism had accommodated certain exceptions: the AFL had supported government intervention on behalf of injured workers and child laborers. AFL officials drew the line at national health insurance, however, partly out of concern for their own power. The fact that AFL outsiders such as the AALL had taken the most prominent advocacy roles antagonized Gompers. That this reform threatened union-sponsored benefit programs championed by Gompers made national health insurance even more objectionable. Indeed, the AFL leadership did face serious organizational divisions. Many unionists, recognizing that union-run health programs covered only a small fraction of union members and that unions represented only a fraction of the nation’s workforce, worked to enact compulsory health insurance in their state legislatures. This activism and the views underlying it came to prevail in the United States labor movement and in 1935 the AFL unequivocally reversed its position on health legislation.
关于语法: 不要期待你在GWD或者Prep里已经滚瓜烂熟的语法结构在这个考试当中都会出现,但是有几道题考到了如下考点: 1、which能做非限制性定语从句,但that不能,非限制性定语从句需要用逗号和主句隔开;在一个名词词组是N1 of N2的结构里要仔细辨别后面的定语从句从语义看到底修饰哪个名词,并且定语从句的动词一定要和被修饰的动词诸位一致。 2、不能守住原来新东方老师公布的所谓GMAT定理不放,比如有些实意动词肯定不能替换,最终还是要看语义和词组的搭配。有个句子实在记不住具体意思了,划线的部分也不长,但是答案比较隐蔽,最终我选择了动词改变了、并且里面有动词+as的选项,主要是,原句未划线部分后面有个as + 名词词组,是和划线部分的结构要平行的。(补充:刚在在770的史上最老蜗牛的帖子里看到了增加的内容,就是我说的这道题:literary critics classified T's work as romantic novel, 几种表述方式,有View啊什么的,我选的是classified as) 关于逻辑: 实在是一道题也想不起来了,但是我觉得大家要记住一点,就是要注意逻辑的所谓“相关性”,要在第一时间找准提干中题目瞄准的结论部分,答案有的时候一时难以看出确切地意思,但是答案一定要和结论有相关性(感觉上,问假设的题目答案用not+weaken或者异因异果的情况不少)!这一点可能对于马上要考试的CDer帮助不大了,但是还有一段时间才考试的TX,要注意在复习过程中,学会在最短时间内去掉无关选项。 数学提醒: 应该每个人都会碰到一定量的JJ,但是提醒各位在看jj的时候不要背答案,重点要看解题思路,到场上要仔细读每一道题,因为JJ回忆者提供的题目,有的时候可能就差一个细微的条件或者一个句子的问法有些偏差而导致真正的答案可能和我们JJ里的答案会不一致。请大家就做到认真读题,仔细计算就好,不要像我,提前一刻钟做完,结果没有拿满分,得不偿失!
请原谅,奉献的东西有限,还是祝福所有的伙伴能够平常心态,发挥正常!
8.6补充逻辑jj: 1、有道题说,现在市面上做的人工diamond几乎已经可以和natural的媲美了,从表面上根本看不出来,于是natural的钻石生产商为了继续保持自己的利润,就计划打广告强调说:天然钻石的lineage使得他们的内在价值更大!然后问假设;有两个选项比较纠结:a.他认为至少钻石产品的lineage可以决定钻石的一部分价值 e.认为人工钻石生产商的钻石里没有什么物质可以通过lineage提高钻石的内在价值的,我当时好像选了e,但是现在觉得这个答案可能错了,太绝对了;
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/8/6 8:22:13编辑过] |