ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1451|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

狒狒45题,望积极参与讨论!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-7-29 23:00:00 | 显示全部楼层

狒狒45题,望积极参与讨论!!!

45. Commissioner: Budget forecasters project a revenue shortfall of a billion dollars in the coming fiscal year. Since there is no feasible way to increase the available funds, our only choice is to decrease expenditures. The plan before you outlines feasible cuts that would yield savings of a billion dollars over the coming fiscal year. We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan.

This reasoning in the commissioner’s argument is flawed because this argument

A.        relies on information that is far from certain

B.        confuses being an adequate solution with being a required solution

C.        inappropriately relies on the opinions of experts

D.       inappropriately employs language that is vague

E.        takes for granted that there is no way to increase available funds

这道题目答案我可以选出来。但是我对题干中的最后一句话有疑问。We will be able to solve the problem we face, therefore, only if we adopt this plan. 是指We will be able to solve the problem we face----> we adopt this plan啊。并不是我们应该理解的那样:只要我们这样做就可以解决问题。

大家觉得有问题吗?

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2007-7-30 17:47:00 | 显示全部楼层

但是A only if B不是应该:A-->B吗?这个就和ls的说法相反了啊。

另外,就算是按照ls的理解,题目中是说adopt this plan 就是solve the problem的必要条件吗?题目中哪一句话提到了?我没有找到啊……

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-8-17 21:09
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部