[揽瓜阁精读] 1. Hispanic Law Water Right

苏二在努力

P1 inn, unlike the unornamented architecture that existed before Americans came, is a fantasy Hispanic structure.
P2 similarly: 19th – 20th century, water rights ostensibly based on Hispanic law, but no resemblance to actual Spanish legal traditions.
•        Despite awareness of water-sharing practices, American judges asserted that water rights originating in the Hispanic period were exclusive and absolute => absolute water rights in a few cities and landowners.
•        In some states, the version of Hispanic law persists: California
P3 in contrast to the individual property interest, a communal water system prevailed in the Hispanic southwest
•        In the time of shortage: water was shared between municipalities and other users
•        The restricted private sector, need grant
•        Can be traced back to medieval and is used in contemporary
•        Based on historical evidence, many scholars criticized 19-20th distorting Hispanic legal traditions.
•        However, legal historians attributed the distortions to judicial ‘loss of Hispanic learning’ or parties falling to present documents.
•        None of the scholars examined the contemporary background of courts’ decisions and researched court files.

苏二在努力

描述类
P1 宾馆完全不像那些没有装修过的西南地区的建筑
P2 类似的，十九世纪晚期到二十世纪，法院建立的水权看起来是根据西班牙的法律，其实完全不是。尽管知道历史真实是共用的，美国法院宣称水权的起源是垄断的，私有的。这些法律使垄断合法化。一些州仍然在用这个法律，尽管没有历史根据。
P3 西班牙的水权是共用的。政府和个人分享水权，特别是在缺水时期。历史学家批评这一曲解法律。一些学家归因于失败的学习或没有把西班牙的法律拿给当时的法院看。没有历史学家分析当时的背景，也没有去看是哪一个知道自己用错了法律