ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Journalist: Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run. However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission. So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

The answer to which of the following questions would be most useful in evaluating the journalist's argument?

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4714

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 11728|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD7-38对参考答案的疑惑

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-5-21 12:18:00 | 显示全部楼层
You're evaluating the argument, (fullfilling requirement => running for governor) not "did Bergeron really fullfill the requirement."
沙发
发表于 2006-5-21 14:02:00 | 显示全部楼层
E is more relevant in the causal relationship between the financial requirement and governor candidacy.  C merely undermines the basis of the argument, not the argument itself.
板凳
发表于 2006-5-21 22:40:00 | 显示全部楼层
Hmm. let's try approaching this differently.

If someone asks you to evaluate the validity of the argument "I bought 1000 lottery tickets today so I must have a good chance at winning it."  You won't think of evaluating it based on "did you really buy 1000 tickets" but the relationship between 1000 tickets and winning the lottery.

Hope that helps!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-18 08:24
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部