ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 8953|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD12的第一篇阅读4-7(觉得我的答案不对请指出)

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-3-24 11:55:00 | 显示全部楼层

It can be inferred from the passage that both Tulving and Clayton would agree with which of the following statements?






  1. Animals’ abilities to use information about a specific past event are not conclusive evidence of episodic memory.
  2. Animals do not share humans’ abilities to reexperience the past through memory.
  3. The accuracy of animals’ memories is difficult to determine through direct experimentation.
  4. Humans tend to recollect single bits of information more accurately than do animals.
  5. The binding of different kinds of information is not a distinctive feature of episodic memory.

我认为A 是对的


The term “episodic memory” was




       introduced by Tulving to refer to what he


       considered a uniquely human capacity—


Line       the ability to recollect specific past events,


  (5)       to travel back into the past in one’s own


mind—as distinct from the capacity simply


to use information acquired through past


experiences.


(30)      information about the what, the where,


and the when.  Such experiments cannot,


however, reveal whether the birds were


       reexperiencing the past when retrieving the


information.  Clayton acknowledged this by


using the term “episodic-like” memory.


(1)从这两部分可以看出 CLAYTON 觉得实验有limited =>>not conclusive evidence of episodic memory.


(2)而T 只说人有又没有说到动物有episodic memory =>> 这个基于动物的实验是 not conclusive evidence of episodic memory. (因为人有episodic memory 但动物不一定啊)


请指教

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-30 10:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部