It can be inferred from the passage that both Tulving and Clayton would agree with which of the following statements?
- Animals’ abilities to use information about a specific past event are not conclusive evidence of episodic memory.
- Animals do not share humans’ abilities to reexperience the past through memory.
- The accuracy of animals’ memories is difficult to determine through direct experimentation.
- Humans tend to recollect single bits of information more accurately than do animals.
- The binding of different kinds of information is not a distinctive feature of episodic memory.
我认为A 是对的
The term “episodic memory” was
introduced by Tulving to refer to what he
considered a uniquely human capacity—
Line the ability to recollect specific past events,
(5) to travel back into the past in one’s own
mind—as distinct from the capacity simply
to use information acquired through past
experiences.
(30) information about the what, the where,
and the when. Such experiments cannot,
however, reveal whether the birds were
reexperiencing the past when retrieving the
information. Clayton acknowledged this by
using the term “episodic-like” memory.
(1)从这两部分可以看出 CLAYTON 觉得实验有limited =>>not conclusive evidence of episodic memory.
(2)而T 只说人有又没有说到动物有episodic memory =>> 这个基于动物的实验是 not conclusive evidence of episodic memory. (因为人有episodic memory 但动物不一定啊)
请指教   |