ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Some anthropologists study modern-day societies of foragers in an effort to learn about our ancient ancestors who were also foragers. A flaw in this strategy is that forager societies are extremely varied. Indeed, any forager society with which anthropologists are familiar has had considerable contact with modern, non-forager societies.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the criticism made above of the anthropologists' strategy?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4714|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11-48

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-7-29 21:31:00 | 显示全部楼层

题干是讲,人类学家从学习当代foraging societies 来学习他们的ancient ancestors 这种做法是不合理的,因为每一个人类学家熟悉的foraging societies都和现代群体有着紧密的联系,所以不可以用这个方法.

What situation would support making this comparison? What if modem-day foragers remain similar to ancient
                        
foragers because of non-changing features of foraging societies throughout history? If these are
                        
features that are not shared with other cultures, then the argument that anthropologists cannot learn about ancient foragers by studying their modern counterparts is weakened.

如果可以证明有一些特点是其他文化没有的,不会因为环境的改变而改变的, 那就不可以说学习现代foraging societies不能知道他们的ancient ancestors 。

沙发
发表于 2006-7-30 16:43:00 | 显示全部楼层
absolutely right
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-28 04:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部