ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

It is theoretically possible that bacteria developed on Mars early in its history and that some were carried to Earth by a meteorite. However, strains of bacteria from different planets would probably have substantial differences in protein structure that would persist over time, and no two bacterial strains on Earth are different enough to have arisen on different planets. So, even if bacteria did arrive on Earth from Mars, they must have died out.

The argument is most vulnerable to which of the following criticisms?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4714

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 5647|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教!GWD第四套40题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2016-10-23 20:10:55 | 显示全部楼层
HarrisZheng 发表于 2012-10-4 20:47
讲故事最容易理解 张三有n个儿子,如果都是一个爹生的,这n个儿子肯定都长的很像,因为这n个都长得很像,所 ...

?  !!!
沙发
发表于 2016-10-23 20:19:15 | 显示全部楼层
想了想为什么E不对
It fails to consider whether there could have been strains of bacteria that originated on Earth and later died out

它只是说could have been,没有说是否所有地球上的细菌都die out

1. all bacteria that originated on Earth later died out --> 现存的都是来自Mars的细菌,因此才测不出不同的蛋白质 --> 所以不能得出来自MARS的细菌都die out了 .  可以削弱原文结论。
2. some bacteria that originated on Earth later died out --> 但是测不出不同的蛋白质 --> 可以推测来自MARS的细菌都die out了。
   支持了原文结论

因此E选项不行。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-7-27 02:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部