ChaseDream
搜索
12345678
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: exan
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-8-4

[复制链接]
71#
发表于 2009-5-15 16:30:00 | 只看该作者
另外, 该题虽然是以细节题的形式出现, 但个人认为还是需要结合文章主旨才能推出正确答案, 这也是GWD 阅读与OG 阅读很明显的一大特征.
72#
发表于 2009-5-16 21:05:00 | 只看该作者

我认为选E  

虽然文中说larger range of participants可以照顾到更多subgroups 但这并不等于说current medical trials已经benefit certain subgroups disproportionately。 并不是一种取非。所以B种说法并不可靠。

E中虽然significantly不太靠谱,因为文中说只有new treatments才会有new and unexpected variables 但注意选项里有一个might be overlooked.  所以变得正确。   

73#
发表于 2010-4-25 15:42:04 | 只看该作者
这个题目我觉得应该选D

E不对,因为:
原文说
Althoughlimiting information collection could increase the risk that researchers willoverlook facts relevant to a study, Frazier and Mosteller contend that suchrisk, never entirely eliminable from research, would still be small in moststudies.
这跟E选
It cannot be freed of the risk that significant variablesmay be overlooked 完全相反。

请牛牛指正!
74#
发表于 2011-8-13 22:50:39 | 只看该作者
I choose E. I don't believe D is right.

They believed the original way of conducting trials was too costly and suggested a more limited trial could achieve a comparable result at a reduced cost. They never suggested the new way was MORE accurate than the old one.
-- by 会员 moominzz (2005/7/22 9:40:00)


d是肯定不对的~同意楼上看法。accurate并没有改变,只是省时省钱而已
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-20 22:59
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部