ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: exan
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd-8-4

[复制链接]
31#
发表于 2006-8-27 18:02:00 | 只看该作者
我也选了C,又没NN可帮忙解答下??
32#
发表于 2006-8-31 14:57:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用seraphblue在2005-11-15 1:31:00的发言:

赞成E。significant不是致命因素,因为它修饰的是variable即原文的facts而不是risk,与原文相符合。

同意!small risk 是指忽略significant variables的风险小

33#
发表于 2006-9-8 21:59:00 | 只看该作者

支持C。ETS不可能在E上犯这么明显的错误:原文明明说的是such risk (overlook fact relevant to a study)would be small in most studies, 在选项上就会变成 The research cannot be freed of the risk that significant variables may be overlooked ?? significant这个词,既在原文中无对应,又非常重,我不信ETS放这么个词在这里是粗心。

C为什么对,26楼的同学解释得很好,支持!!!

34#
发表于 2006-9-15 04:14:00 | 只看该作者
我本来选的是B。B的错误是需要infer才能得出的答案,而according to的题都是supporting ideas,应该在原文中找答案,所以正确答案只能是C或者E。
E的问题是将facts replaced with significant variables,没有根据。
而C的问题是将likely换成了routinely,前者是表示可能,而后者则表示常规性地。虽然不是特别妥当,但相对而言,是最佳答案。
35#
发表于 2006-10-9 04:24:00 | 只看该作者

我也是b,e当中抉择了半天,选了B>_<

始终觉得e当中的significant有问题。 但是c当中,把likely to换成routinely显然是错的,rountinely有always的含义,但是likely to只是表示有可能,这两者概念完全不同。 我觉得要找答案应该找和原文概念以及程度都匹配选项才对。这里B,C显然程度都不匹配,相当于出现了新概念,怎么能说是according to原文呢?

虽然我也觉得B很别扭,可是就是找不到一个强烈的理由说服我选E。

有没有NN来解释一下阿,困惑中

36#
发表于 2006-10-9 15:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用kathy8446在2006-8-31 14:57:00的发言:

同意!small risk 是指忽略significant variables的风险小

说的太精辟了.大家静心考虑一下,KATHY说的一阵见血!! E correct

37#
发表于 2006-10-11 00:54:00 | 只看该作者

I chose C when I was doing GWD. But when I compared the passage with the choices again, I preferred E.

"Only in research on entirely new treatments are new and unexpected variables likely to arise. " - C. It routinely reveals new variables in research on entirely new treatments.

 

C changes something likely happen to routinely happen, an unacceptable change.

 

"Although limiting information collection could increase the risk that researchers will overlook facts relevant to a study, Frazier and Mosteller contend that such risk, never entirely eliminable from research, would still be small in most studies. " - E. It cannot be freed of the risk that significant variables may be overlooked.

 

E adds "significant" to the "facts relevant to a study", then plays a trick by saying "may" to make this choice consistent with the sentence in the passage. Risk of overlooking "facts relevant to a study" cannot be eliminated from research and the "facts" "may" include the "significant variables".  How tricky the ETS is! LET'S BEAT IT DOWN!!!

38#
发表于 2006-11-8 14:19:00 | 只看该作者

39#
发表于 2006-12-9 14:15:00 | 只看该作者

晕了都

40#
发表于 2007-2-4 22:38:00 | 只看该作者
the article really points out that "such risk is never entirely eliminable from research", so put it in other words,it is just as E.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-5-21 12:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部