ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: huluhulufei
打印 上一主题 下一主题

huluhulufei 的作业贴~

[复制链接]
61#
发表于 2012-9-17 23:42:49 | 只看该作者
谢谢!!!!!TAT
一起加油!
62#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-18 20:40:14 | 只看该作者
9.18   综合  TPO 22

The reading holds the point that the alternative resource, ethanol, is of three main drawbacks that it isn't a good replacement for gasoline. However, the professor in the lecture points out that none of these points is tenable. He uses three specific points to support his idea.

First, even though the passage argues that ethanol emit carbon dioxide to the environment, the professor claims that it doesn't necessarily lead to environment problem. Corn is known as the main plant that makes ethanol, and the carbon dioxide it absorbs has already counteracted that it emit. In fact, plant has already removed cordon dioxide from the atmosphere. Therefore the professor's statement directly contradicts its counterpart in the reading.

Second, though the statement in the reading that the amounts of ethanol would reduce the amount of plants available for animals, the professor contends that the specific plant part, on the plant’s cell walls that contributes to ethanol, is not eaten by animals, thus do no harm to the resources for animal. In this way, animals will not face with a lack of food.

Third, though the passage asserts that ethanol fuel will never be able to compete with gasoline on price because of its high price and the tax subsidies from the government, the professor proves that it's indefensible. The situation will not last long as far as more people buy ethanol fuel and its production is enlarged. It is proved that if the production amount is three times greater than it is now, its unit cost will surely drop 40 percent. If this is the case, ethanol price will not be a problem.
63#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-18 21:36:26 | 只看该作者
918
In order to solve the problems of the present and the future, people should review the past.



History always has surprisingly coincidence. Its potential regulation is a big factor that contributes to the highlighted concern that we should review the past in order to solve problems of the present and the future. In this way, I strongly agree with the statement. The specific points are as follows.

To begin with, experiences form the past help us to evade the same failure in the future. No one could deny the crude phenomenon during the Second World War, when Japan was the target for the explosion of atom bomb. Faced with terrible results it brings, people should carefully use the nuclear power, not only in wars, but also in resources production.The lesson that the explosion of nuclear power station in Japan gives us a heavy strike, which recommends our offspring the significance of location and control of building new stations. Only after the review of the past, will we further understand how to evade the same failure.

In addition, it’s also the review of past that instigate our ambition for success. Take China for example. During the darkest period in Chinese history, namely the 19th, the week Chinese government and the tumultuous social situation made it vulnerable to western countries. No weapon, no high standard social regulations, and no strong leaders finally provided opportunities for invasion. Luckily, several decades later, the lesson instigated a new generation, who swore to save the whole nation, set up a new history legend. After continuous efforts to build a strong nation, China now is no longer its old fatigue. It is just the view of the past that instigates the will to fight for a bright future.

However, we should cautiously compare the situations between now and past, when decide to make a significant claim. Society now develops at a dramatic high speed that people have to struggle really hard to keep up with its speed. Therefore, though it’s of importance to learn from the past, when concern the various situations now, people have to judge the factors that outdated. For example, 27 years ago my mom was admitted in a college, due to her hard work in high school. However now, whenever my mom forces me to only concentrate on textbooks, I may shrug my shoulders, because students now should not only be equipped with basic knowledge in textbooks, but also the ability to receive information from internet and society. Pedants may receive respect and honor in the past, but now, it surely doesn’t work.

In sum, from what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that when carefully compare the situations between now and past, people should surely review the past in order to solve the problems of present and future, because of its rich experiences.
64#
发表于 2012-9-19 10:13:53 | 只看该作者
不好意思啊 改成别人的了 现在才发现。。。果断补上

本帖子中包含更多资源

您需要 登录 才可以下载或查看,没有帐号?立即注册

x
65#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-19 13:49:03 | 只看该作者
919
It is more important to choose friends that have fun with than to choose friendsthat will help you when you need them .


Faced with the tough situation nowadays, young people can hardly handle their life orientation especially when they strive for a better future. The highly competitive society and the heavy burden it brings make the young generation consider seriously what kind of friends they should choose. Though it may have amusement to accompany friends that have fun, the friends that will help us when we are trapped in a difficult situation are of priority to choose from. Therefore I strongly disagree with the title’s statement. The specific ideas are as follows.

To begin with, only those who can help us will truly open more opportunities to improve ourselves. Of course, no one in this world is born with plenty of skills that don’t need anyone’s help. Nearly everyone, as long as he lives among people, will face with difficulties in both life and career. Just like the old saying goes that the more friends we have, the more ways we can choose from. However, the potential significance of the saying is that such friends are those who can help us when we are in need of a helping hand, but not those only have fun. For example, when I was confused by some complex mathematics formulations in high school, it was my best friend that patiently helped me to handle with even the easiest problems, however my friends who always have fun just walked away. Therefore, it’s the friends that can help us that we can rely on.

In addition, the characters of the two types of friends vary a lot. Obviously, those we can make fun are more likely to go to parties, play computer games, talk about funny jokes, and have the tendency to find anything amusing around them. With such personalities, they are more satisfied with the extant conditions, without worrying about the future. On the contrary, those who want to help are those who have more responsibilities, and it’s often the case that they’re with fidelity. Therefore, our secrets and problems could be safely shared with those who can help us. Those who have fun are considered only as friends whom we want to relax with.

However, the advantages of accompanying friends who have fun are obvious: the humorous atmosphere they create helps us to live in a relaxing mood. Nowadays university students are loaded with heavy burden of academic works. Though the friends who help us can solve our problems in time, the potential burden they add to us should also not be neglected. Each time I faced with the phenomenon that when I was helpless to solve mathematics works, it was always my best friend to make it, I felt that more burdens was loaded on my shoulders. However, I always choose those who can make fun to accompany my lunch time because during lunch, the stress on my shoulders seems are totally lifted away.

In sum, from what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that it's more important to choose friends that can help us than that have fun, because of their fidelity and eagerness that help to improve ourselves, though sometimes it brings more burden to us.
66#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-19 14:32:22 | 只看该作者
9.19     TPO 23



The reading holds the points that there’re three main reasons for the yellow cedar declining. However, the professor in the lecture claims that none of these factors adequate to explain for its decline. He uses three specific points to illustrate his idea.

First, even though the reading argues that it’s cedar bark beetle, which attack yellow cedar, that contribute to its die, the professor in the lecture points out that it’s unconvincing. Because yellow cedar can secret a kind of chemical that poison the cedar bark beetle, the resistance ability of insect infection can surely protect itself. In other words, the cedar bark beetle can hardly survive in such environment in yellow cedar. Only the sick and unhealthy yellow cedar is vulnerable to the cedar bark beetle. Therefore, the professor’s statement directly contradicts its counterpart in the lecture.

Second, even though the statement in the passage that brown bear is a great threat to yellow cedar, the professor contends that such threat is overestimated. The main island where yellow cedar grows is without bears, let alone to assert that it’s bears who kill yellow cedar. Though it’s true that bow bear may damage some yellow cedar, it’s untenable to argue that it’s responsible for the decline whole yellow cedar species.

Third, though the passage asserts that it’s the root explosion under cold that makes yellow cedar unhealthy, the professor argues that it overlooks one point that directly contradicts this conclusion. It has been proved that yellow cedar in lower elevation, where it’s warm, is less healthy than that in higher elevation, where the climate is much colder. If the statement in the passage is true, then the fact in real world should just be the opposite.
67#
发表于 2012-9-20 19:03:33 | 只看该作者
The reading holds the points that there’re three main reasons for the yellow cedar declining. However, the professor in the lecture claims that none of these factors adequate to explain for its decline. He uses three specific points to illustrate his idea.

First, even though the reading argues that it’s cedar bark beetle, which attacks yellow cedar, that contributes to itsits指代的yellow cedar在句子中没有提及吧) die, the professor in the lecture points out that it’s unconvincing. Because yellow cedar can secretsecret有动词的能力么)a kind of chemical that poison the cedar bark beetle, the resistance ability of insect infection can surely protect itself. In other words, the cedar bark beetle can hardly survive in such environment in yellow cedar. Only the sick and unhealthy yellow cedar is vulnerable to the cedar bark beetle. Therefore, the professor’s statement directly contradicts its counterpart in the lecture.

Second, even though the statement in the passage that brown bear is a great threat to yellow cedar, the professor contends that such threat is overestimated. The main island(听力里面说的是 main landbear吧,其他的island没有bear) where yellow cedar grows is without bears, let alone to assert that it’s bears who kill yellow cedar. Though it’s true that bowbrown bear may damage some yellow cedar, it’s untenable to argue that it’s responsible for the decline whole yellow cedar species.

Third, though the passage asserts that it’s the root explosion under cold that makes yellow cedar unhealthy, the professor argues that it overlooks one point that directly contradicts this conclusion. It has been proved that yellow cedar in lower elevation, where it’s warm, is less healthy than that in higher elevation, where the climate is much colder. If the statement in the passage is true, then the fact in real world should just be the opposite.

改的稍微晚点了,请见谅。文章的写得很好的,词汇的用法也很得体,三个观点之间的对比辩论也不错
68#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-20 19:24:38 | 只看该作者
对的,我说的是main island ,也就是主要的岛屿, 听力中说的是mainland,也就是大陆,这两个不一样~~ 听力中的island就是我这里的main island
69#
发表于 2012-9-20 21:13:15 | 只看该作者
开头写的真好

Faced withthe tough situation nowadays, young people can hardly handle their lifeorientation especially when they strive for a better future. The highlycompetitive society and the heavy burden it brings make the young generationconsider seriously what kind of friends they should choose. Though it may haveamusement to accompany friends that have fun, the friends that will help uswhen we are trapped in a difficult situation are of priority to choose from.Therefore I strongly disagree with the title’s statement. The specific ideasare as follows.

To begin with, only those who can help us willtruly open more opportunities(open opportunities是够正确我不清楚哈~offer opportunities这个我确定~) to improve ourselves. Of course, no one in thisworld is born with plenty of skills that don’t need anyone’s help. Nearlyeveryone, as long as he lives among people(这是什么意思~群居吗?), will face with difficulties in both life and career. Just like theold saying goes that the more friends we have, the more ways we can choosefrom. However, the potential significance of the saying is that such friendsare those who can help us when we are in need of a helping hand, but not thoseonly have fun. For example, when I was confused by some complex mathematicsformulations in high school, it was my best friend that patiently helped me tohandle with even the easiest problems, however my friends who always have(had) fun just walkedaway. Therefore, it’s the friends that can help us that we can rely on.

In addition, the characters of the two types offriends vary a lot. Obviously, those we can make fun are more likely to go toparties, play computer games, talk about funny jokes, and have the tendency tofind anything amusing around them. With such personalities, they are moresatisfied with the extant conditions, without worrying about the future. On thecontrary, those who want to help are those who have more responsibilities(are more awared of 怎么样~), and it’s often the case that they’re withfidelity. Therefore, our secrets and problems could be safely shared with thosewho can help us. Those who have fun are considered only as friends whom we wantto relax with.

However, the advantages of accompanying friendswho have fun are obvious: the humorous atmosphere they create helps us to live in a relaxingmood. Nowadays university students are loaded with heavy burden of academicworks. Though the friends who help us can solve our problems in time, thepotential burden they add to us should also not be neglected. Each time I facedwith the phenomenon(不是很恰当吧~situation怎么样) thatwhen I was helpless to solve(个人感觉solving更好一点) mathematics works,it was always my best friend to make it, I felt that more burdens was(were) loaded on myshoulders. However, I always choose those who can make fun to accompany in my lunch timebecause during lunch, the stress on my shoulders seemsare(to be) totally lifted away.

In sum, from what has been discussed above, wemay safely draw the conclusion that it's more important to choose friends thatcan help us than that have fun, because of their fidelity and eagerness thathelp to improve ourselves, though sometimes it brings more burden to us.



总体而言写的不错哦~
熊熊水平有限,可能改的不是很恰当,见谅
70#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-20 22:01:46 | 只看该作者
9.20综合TPO 24

The reading holds the point that the T. rex’s leg bone still remains some actual tissue. However, the professor in the lecture casts doubt on it. He uses three specific points to support his idea.

First, even though the passage argues that the soft substance in the leg bone is actually the dinosaur’s blood vessels, the professor gives an alternative explanation. Because bacteria always occupy hollows after organism dies, and leave organic material, the soft substance is probably from the traces of soft residuals of bacteria colonies. In this way, the professor’s statement directly contradicts its counterpart in the passage.

Second, though the statement in the reading that the spheres in the leg bone reflect its red blood cells, the professor in the lecture disputes that it’s inconvincible. Because the spheres are also discovered from other animal fossils at the same location, which don’t have red blood cells when they are alive, we can’t conclude that spheres definitely lead to reflection of red blood cells. It may be only reddish minerals.

Third, though the passage asserts that collagen matrix found in the leg bone is the representation of its bone tissue, the professor proves it’s untenable. Normally, collagen can only survive within 100 thousand years, however the dinosaur was alive 70 million years ago. Therefore the collagen can’t be the dinosaur’s. What’s more, as human skin always carries collagen, it might be the researcher’s hand’s collagen that left when they handle bones.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS



近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-6 12:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部