huluhulufei 的作业贴~

huluhulufei

7月26日Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People are now easier to become educated than in the past.



There is a general discussion these days over education. One of the questions under debate is whether people now are easier to become educated than in the past. The information I have collected in the last few years leads me to believe that the statement is of no problem, due to the various ways of knowledge acquiring, the much more positive influence from family, and the strong appetite for knowledge. The specific reasons are as follows.

To begin with, people nowadays are facing an increasing number of ways to obtain education. Hardly could anyone forget the poor condition in the past, which could provide nearly nothing for the requirement for learning. However, the environment has advanced by the development of technologies. The fast and efficient function of the internet has provided people with tons of useful information for us to search. We can never be bored of one particular website, because we can always find something else to choose from. What’s more, the improvement of publication system has improved not only the quantity of books, but also the categories. In this way, people have a much better chance to approach education opportunities, which makes residents more educated than in the past.

In addition, family members now are playing a far more important role in people’s education status. This is really the case due to the new harmonious society and knowledge of the old generations. During the hard time when world war exploded, hardly could anyone find opportunity to survive, let alone learn knowledge. However, time goes by, and the development of new education regulations of new born nation has made it possible for our previous generation to receive education. Now, people nowadays can not only receive the basic principles from their parents, but also learn past experiences from their grandparents. Moreover, the stability of the extent society also contributes greatly to the high education quality nowadays.

What’s more, the highly competitive society has made people nowadays have a strong appetite for knowledge, which is beneficial to both their future job hunting and social network. For example, masters in the past decade would never worry about their jobs because of their high education diplomat. However, the increasing number of masters nowadays makes it really hard for them to find a satisfying working position. In this way, only by competing for more education opportunities to make a person handle social skills, could him survive in this highly competitive society. In this way, there’s no doubt that people now are easier to be educated.

In sum, from what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that people now are easier to be educated, because of the various ways they have to approach education opportunities, much more positive influence from family members, and the unsatiated appetite for knowledge in order to survive.

sherryzhangh

不太会修改,请见谅,只是个人意见. 谢谢.

There is a general discussion these days over education. (开头句最好别用there is, 这个是大忌。Education has been intensely discussed those days. ) One of the questions under debate is whether people now are easier to become educated than in the past. The information I have collected in the last few years leads me to believe that the statement is of no problem, due to the various ways of knowledge acquiring; the much more positive influence from family; Moreover,and the strong appetite for knowledge. The specific reasons are as follows.

To begin with, people nowadays are facing an increasing number of ways to obtain education. Hardly could anyone forget the poor condition in the past, which could provide nearly nothing for the requirement for learning. However, the environment has been advanced by the development of technologies. The fast and efficient function of the internet has provided people with tons of useful information for us to search. We can never be bored of one particular website, because we can always find something else to choose from. What’s more, the improvement of publication system has improved not only the quantity of books, but also the categories. In this wayTherefore people have a much better chance to approach education opportunities, which makes residents more educated than in the past.

In addition, family members now are playing a far more important role in people’s education status. This is really the case due to the new harmonious society and knowledge of the old generations. During the hard time when world war exploded, hardly could anyone find opportunity to survive, let alone learn knowledge. However, as time goes by, and the development of new education regulations of new born nation has made it possible for our previous generation to receive education. Nowadays, people nowadays can not only can receive the basic principles from their parents, but also learn past experiences from their grandparents. Moreover, the stability of the extent society also contributes greatly to the high education quality nowadays.

What’s more, the highly competitive society has made people nowadays have a strong appetite for knowledge, which is beneficial to both their future job hunting and social network. For example, masters in the past decade would never worry about their jobs because of their high education diplomat. However, the increasing number of masters nowadays makes it really hard for them to find a satisfying working position. In this way, only by competing for more education opportunities to make a person handle social skills, could him survive in this highly competitive society. In this way, Thus, there’s no doubt that people now are easier to be educated. (你该有多喜欢Nowadays和 In this way？找一些可替换的词呀)

In sum, from what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that people now are easier to be educated, because of the various ways they have to approach education opportunities, much more positive influence from family members, and the unsatiated appetite for knowledge in order to survive.

huluhulufei

feifei 明天就考试去喽~  感谢这些天在CD的日子！感谢你们！  考完回来改哦~~

huluhulufei

feifei 归来~！ 10天备战托福，下周六考，写作小分队I‘m back!

huluhulufei

9.16  综合  TPO 20

The passage asserts the drawbacks of ‘let it burn’ policy, and argues three kinds of damage it brings out. However, the professor claims in the lecture that the fire truly brings out benefits. He uses three specific points to support his idea.

First, even though the reading asserts that Yellowstone fires make the vegetation devastated, a large portion of which is scorched, the professor points out that the fire really brings some benefits. This is because after the fire, new plants grow, covering the original scorched places, which makes vegetations various. What’s more, the open space and shade provide opportunity for small plants to grow, which take place the destroyed trees; and only by heats, some plant seeds can germinate. Obviously the germination and plants variety are what the Yellowstone fires contribute to. In this way, the professor’s statement disproves its counterpart in the passage.

Second, though the statement in the passage that animal population and food chain have been damaged by the fire, the professor claims just the opposite. Not only the animal population recovered after the fire, the food chain has been much stronger than before, because of the growth of small plants, which feed small animals like rabbits and hares thus benefit its predators.

Third, the reading argues that tourist’s trend is highly negatively affected by the fire, thus brings disadvantages to the local economy, whereas the professor points out that it's quite an unusual affair that the Yellowstone fire happens. In fact, after the fire, the tourists come as usual each year. The coincidence factors that contribute to the fire can hardly be made later. In this way, the professor proves the reading’s statement indefensible.

huluhulufei

9月16日
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : children should engage in similar jobs that their parents have?


Nowadays, faced with the phenomenon that people have to struggle really hard in order to survive in this highly competitive society, people gradually jump to conclusion that it’s of great advantages to make their children engage in similar jobs that their parents have. Similarly, I agree with the statement. The specific points are as follows.

To begin with, it’s the precious experiences that children receive from their parents that equip them with the great advantage to survive in the area. This always happens when it requires special skills in a specific field. For example, children will of course touch some medicine-related affairs during their growth period when their parents are both doctors. Therefore, the medical equipment they’ve seen, the patients’ stories they’ve heard, and the basic principles that medical texture books contain are precious experiences they inherit from their parents, which in turn affect positively on their career in medical field. Compared with their colleagues, who haven’t experienced such process during the growing stage, these children are with great priorities to be excellent doctors, because of their extra medical resources.

What’s more, the social networks that parents hold will help a lot more to support their children’s career if the children continue their parent’s tracks on the field. No one would deny that the struggle people undertake in this cruel society. White collars need to get up extreme early, always with no time for lunch, and working extra hours is usually stock-in-trade. However, if a person has some social networks, things alters dramatically. For example, if the boss of a company that an employee wants to contend is his relative, the chance for him is much higher. In this way, parent’s network will help children a lot to find better colleges, better job opportunities. Therefore, the advantages for children to have similar career as their parents is self-evident.

However, its drawbacks are also obvious. The psychological priority children hold may bring them pride. For example, children whose major is mathematics, and whose parents are scientists, may think for granted that the formulas on textbooks are too easy to seriously deduce. Obviously, they’ll soon find their foolish decision to overlook the most important procedures in mathematics learning. Besides, the pressure that the children undertake accompanying with their growing stage is quite heavy, because they face the crucial reality that relatives, friends of both themselves and their parents always happily compare them with their parents, and even their career achievements easily owe to their parents’ efforts. In such circumstance, children could hardly happy do the same job as their parents.

In sum, from what have been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that it’s wise decision for children to have similar careers as their parents’, because of the extra experiences and social network, though its drawbacks is obvious and couldn’t be neglected.

d0gzi

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : children should engage in similar jobs that their parents have?


Nowadays, faced with the phenomenon that people(改成THEY 会不会更好一点？ 因为主语在后面前面可以用代词） have to struggle really hard in order to survive in this highly competitive society, people gradually jump to conclusion that it’s of great advantages to make their children engage in similar jobs that their parents have. Similarly, I agree with the statement. The specific points are as follows.

To begin with, it’s the precious experiences that children receive from their parents that equip them with the great advantage to survive in the area. This always happens when it requires special skills in a specific field. For example, children will of course touch some medicine-related affairs （touch 改成 get an easier access to 是不是会更好点？还有，affair一提我就觉得有贬义。。你觉得ISSUE或者TOPICS 会不会好一点？）during their growth period when their parents are both doctors. Therefore, the medical equipment they’ve seen, the patients’ stories they’ve heard, and the basic principles that medical texture books contain are precious experiences they inherit from their parents, which in turn affect positively on their career in medical field. Compared with their colleagues, who haven’t experienced such process during the growing stage, these children are with great(er) priorities to be (become)excellent doctors, because of their extra medical resources.

What’s more, the social networks that parents hold will help a lot more to support their children’s career if the children continue their parent’s tracks on(in)the field. No one would deny that the struggle people undertake (undertake responsibility ..bear struggle)in this cruel society. White collars need to get up extreme early, always with no time for lunch, and working extra hours is usually stock-in-trade. However, if a person has some social networks, things alters dramatically. For example, if the boss of a company that an employee wants to contend is his relative, the chance for him is much higher. In this way, parent’s network will help children a lot to find better colleges, better job opportunities. Therefore, the advantages for children to have similar career as their parents is self-evident.

However, its drawbacks are also obvious. The psychological priority children hold may bring them pride. For example, children whose major is mathematics, and whose parents are scientists, may think for granted that the formulas on textbooks are too easy to seriously deduce. Obviously, they’ll soon find their foolish decision to overlook the most important procedures in mathematics learning. Besides, the pressure that the children undertake accompanying with their growing stage is quite heavy, because they face the crucial reality that relatives, friends of both themselves and their parents always happily compare them with their parents, and even their career achievements easily owe to their parents’ efforts. In such circumstance, children could hardly happy (happily)do the same job as their parents.

In sum, from what have been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that it’s(a)wise decision for children to have similar careers as their parents’, because of the extra experiences and social network, though its drawbacks is obvious and couldn’t be neglected.

1. 这是我改的第一篇文章。。改的不好或者不对的地方请谅解。
2.感觉观点挺明确的。。写的挺好的
3.黄的地方是我觉得有问题的地方。红的是我觉得你用的很好的地方。

d0gzi

The passage asserts the drawbacks of ‘let it burn’ policy, and argues three kinds of damage it brings out. However, the professor claims in the lecture that the fire truly brings out benefits. He uses three specific points to support his idea.

First, even though the reading asserts that Yellowstone fires make the vegetation devastated, a large portion of which is scorched, the professor points out that the fire really brings some benefits. This is because after the fire, new plants grow, covering the original scorched places, which makes vegetations various. What’s more, the open space and shade provide opportunity for small plants to grow, which take place the destroyed trees; and only by heats, some plant seeds can germinate. Obviously the germination and plants variety are what the Yellowstone fires contribute to. In this way, the professor’s statement disproves its counterpart in the passage.

Second, though the statement in the passage that animal population and food chain have been damaged by the fire, the professor claims just the opposite. Not only the animal population recovered after the fire, the food chain has been much stronger than before, because of the growth of small plants, which feed small animals like rabbits and hares thus benefit its predators.

Third, the reading argues that tourist’s trend is highly negatively affected by the fire, thus brings disadvantages to the local economy, whereas the professor points out that it's quite an unusual affair that the Yellowstone fire happens. In fact, after the fire, the tourists come as usual each year. The coincidence factors that contribute to the fire can hardly be made later. In this way, the professor proves the reading’s statement indefensible.



我觉得我会给你5分吧……要点全都全了还有细节……很不错
TAT 天呐为什么我会有一个要点直接听错了呢……

huluhulufei

9.17  综合 TPO 21

The reading holds the point that genetically modified trees have three mainly benefits. However, the professor in the lecture argues just the opposite. She uses three specific points to illustrate her idea.

First, even though the passage claims that genetically modified trees are hardier than nature trees, the professor in the lecture points out that it doesn't necessarily mean genetically modified trees are ensured to survive. Some nature individual trees will survive if the species are faced with a really tough condition, thus pass on the species' gene. On the contrary, genetically modified trees are so genetically uniform that if any environmental factor changes, which damages the tree, all of them will surely die out. Therefore, the professor's statement disproves its counterpart in the passage.

Second, though the statement in the reading that genetically modified trees will bring a number of economic benefits to those who grow them, the professor asserts that the potential cost is really huge. The company that raises genetically modified trees will surely ask for every tree the farmers plant by law. So each season when grow trees, farmers will pay a lot to the company.

Third, though the passage claims that genetically modified trees will save endangered native trees, the professor argues just the opposite. Because genetically modified trees grow so aggressively, they will compete with native trees. The resources they obtain will eventually help them crowd out native trees, among which they grow. In this way, the professor proves the reading's statement untenable.

huluhulufei

9.17Grades (marks) encourage students to learn？A\D



Nowadays in this highly competitive society, people have to struggle really hard in order to survive. Someone then argues that it’s necessary for students to raise such habit, namely to make a ‘marks like’ mechanism to encourage them to study hard. However, when faced with its dramatic disadvantages, I strongly disagree with such assertion. The specific points are as follows.

To begin with, I concede that grades are a kind of signal that more or less judges a student’s study level. After all, no other effective methods available like grades can actually reflect a student’s study ability. What’s more, the relatively moderate competition among students will instigate their high interests in study, though in some extent they do so for the aim of outpacing others. Just like the old saying goes: competition is the source of all human progress.

However, when concerned with the nature of education and the burden it brings to students, we may hardly agree with its significance in study. First, education is to explore students’ potential, not to judge if they pass an exam or not. The inner aim that education maintains is to make students truly interested on their major field, to explore the unknown around them. Only their own interests can lead them to do so, not grades. Second, not all students can rank number one among their fellows. The burden grades take to them will surely have negative effects on both their academic works and life. Unluckily, it may ruin a student’s whole interests on study. In such circumstance, for long term consideration, grades are only a small part in student’s study.

Besides, the competition that students taste when pursue for higher grades makes them fear any kind of competition in the future, let alone the study. No one could deny that there’s not such a person that always wins in any particular field. There will be one day he is outpaced by another person. Most of people will face failure in one particular competition. Therefore, if study is labeled as a weapon to win, many may fear to undertake it. For example, the first physics grade I took when I was a junior student in high school really let me down, and I feared a lot more whenever I took physics exams later. However, it proved later that I was with excellent talents to study physics. Even so, I still have more or less fear towards exams. It really has negative effects on my physics career.

In sum, from what has been discussed above, we may safely draw the conclusion that though grades have more or less effects on students’ study, its disadvantages have already outpaced its advantage, because of its deviation from education principle, and heavy burden it brings to students.