长江03，04同学集体答疑－－让我们一起Chase dream

lobster

It is said that CKGSB MBA develops future business leaders...I feel werid about this slogan, how can they develop this ? Can I feel the development if I enter CKGSB? Is there anything different with ceibs? I know they are among top business chools now.  

aa_aa_1

I think that CK has made great improvement in the past two month. If you read their website and meet with the director and other staff there, you will easily find it. They have changed their past style which is to speak slogan always. The reason is that the head of MBA Director has been changed and the key MBA admissions people have been changed including Martin Zhou and Steven Ji.

Interestingly, both of them and probabaly Li Jie included will be back to CEIBS. (a big joke to CEIBS). Does that mean CEIBS style will be changed back to Li Jie's style? That's really a bad news to CEIBS MBA.

Even though CK changed the style a lot, I still think they need to improve a lot which make them to be more steadfast and professional. But I am really happy to see those changes.

Anyway, I think to whatever you choose CEIBS or CKGSB, there are big risks existed since there is no healthy supervision system in both of the schools (CK is better than CEIBS), all depends on the leader of the school. Suppose the leader's power is out of control, the school will gradually become a disaster. CEIBS is now facing such big problem.

总是两难

以下是引用aa_aa_1在2005-4-6 17:20:00的发言：

I think that CK has made great improvement in the past two month. If you read their website and meet with the director and other staff there, you will easily find it. They have changed their past style which is to speak slogan always. The reason is that the head of MBA Director has been changed and the key MBA admissions people have been changed including Martin Zhou and Steven Ji.

Interestingly, both of them and probabaly Li Jie included will be back to CEIBS. (a big joke to CEIBS). Does that mean CEIBS style will be changed back to Li Jie's style? That's really a bad news to CEIBS MBA.

Even though CK changed the style a lot, I still think they need to improve a lot which make them to be more steadfast and professional. But I am really happy to see those changes.

Anyway, I think to whatever you choose CEIBS or CKGSB, there are big risks existed since there is no healthy supervision system in both of the schools (CK is better than CEIBS), all depends on the leader of the school. Suppose the leader's power is out of control, the school will gradually become a disaster. CEIBS is now facing such big problem.

留意四，你删我的帖，不就因为你是长江的吗？我讲话没跟剧，红字部分有根据？

HUMMER1

顶! 建议同时拿到中欧和长江的OFFER 的同学都去实地考察一下校园, 与那里的员工,同学,教授面谈交流一下, 争取旁听一次课.

中欧下一个模块是六月二十日开学,那时交换的八十名左右的同学都会来了. 很好的感受上课氛围的机会.

论坛不应该是用来攻击竞争对手的地方!

lobster

楼上的建议好！应该与两个校园看一看。

lewis

以下是引用总是两难在2005-4-7 7:55:00的发言：

留意四，你删我的帖，不就因为你是长江的吗？我讲话没跟剧，红字部分有根据？

呵呵。“总是两难”和“CEIBS_MBA2005”一唱一和，一中一英，很自我欣赏吧？！

“总是两难”或者说“CEIBS_MBA2005”（因为这两个ID来自同一个IP），我从来就不否认我是长江的学生，不过，CD论坛的宗旨是：会员间分享和互助，一同走向成功，我和CD的绝大多数会员因为信奉同样的精神，而聚在CD。可是，你的部分帖子已经违背了该精神，所以我是删了你相关的帖子（同时给你短信说明了原因）。

不过，我还是欢迎你（“总是两难”或是“CEIBS_MBA2005”）继续参与CD论坛的“分享”和“互助”。

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-7 15:46:22编辑过]

CEIBS_MBA2005

以下是引用lewis在2005-4-7 15:41:00的发言：

呵呵。“总是两难”和“CEIBS_MBA2005”一唱一和，一中一英，很自我欣赏吧？！

“总是两难”或者说“CEIBS_MBA2005”（因为这两个ID来自同一个IP），我从来就不否认我是长江的学生，不过，CD论坛的宗旨是：会员间分享和互助，一同走向成功，我和CD的绝大多数会员因为信奉同样的精神，而聚在CD。可是，你的部分帖子已经违背了该精神，所以我是删了你相关的帖子（同时给你短信说明了原因）。

不过，我还是欢迎你（“总是两难”或是“CEIBS_MBA2005”）继续参与CD论坛的“分享”和“互助”。

   Hehe. SAME IP means SAME people. Then all Chasedream staffs must be ONE.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-7 16:28:01编辑过]

CEIBS_MBA2005

以下是引用lewis在2005-4-7 15:41:00的发言：

呵呵。“总是两难”和“CEIBS_MBA2005”一唱一和，一中一英，很自我欣赏吧？！

“总是两难”或者说“CEIBS_MBA2005”（因为这两个ID来自同一个IP），我从来就不否认我是长江的学生，不过，CD论坛的宗旨是：会员间分享和互助，一同走向成功，我和CD的绝大多数会员因为信奉同样的精神，而聚在CD。可是，你的部分帖子已经违背了该精神，所以我是删了你相关的帖子（同时给你短信说明了原因）。

不过，我还是欢迎你（“总是两难”或是“CEIBS_MBA2005”）继续参与CD论坛的“分享”和“互助”。

你的部分帖子已经违背了该精神，所以我是删了你相关的帖子

by what standards?

lewis

以下是引用CEIBS_MBA2005在2005-4-7 16:14:00的发言：

你的部分帖子已经违背了该精神，所以我是删了你相关的帖子

by what standards?

以下是引用Zeros在2005-3-18 14:49:00的发言：

ChaseDream维护的是一个平台，信息基本上全部是由会员提供，对于这些信息的价值，我们没有能力去逐一评估也不希望影响会员的判断，留给会员自已鉴别。版主做的工作是维护一个基本的、尽量简单的规则，使讨论有一个基本正常的秩序，使讨论更多涉及一些实质性的内容，尽量减少情绪上的宣泄。

这些基本的规则主要包括：
1、重复发帖；一般只保留一帖
2、纯“水”帖；例如：“顶”，“ding”之类
3、对个人的不尊重；
4、纯广告帖；

虽然这些规则只有短短4条，版主在执时还是会遇到一些困难，比如有一些帖子在涉及上面规则的同时，也提供了一些信息，或在程度上可以忍受（版主判断），版主会选择保留或推迟一段时间，待告一段落后删除。

对于1、2、4条，没有商量的余地；对于3，因为判断起来，不同会员有不同的标准，如对版主操作有不同意见，可以向版主提出。

CEIBS_MBA2005

以下是引用lewis在2005-4-7 16:20:00的发言：

ChaseDream维护的是一个平台，信息基本上全部是由会员提供，对于这些信息的价值，我们没有能力去逐一评估也不希望影响会员的判断，留给会员自已鉴别。版主做的工作是维护一个基本的、尽量简单的规则，使讨论有一个基本正常的秩序，使讨论更多涉及一些实质性的内容，尽量减少情绪上的宣泄。

这些基本的规则主要包括：
1、重复发帖；一般只保留一帖
2、纯“水”帖；例如：“顶”，“ding”之类
3、对个人的不尊重；
4、纯广告帖；

虽然这些规则只有短短4条，版主在执时还是会遇到一些困难，比如有一些帖子在涉及上面规则的同时，也提供了一些信息，或在程度上可以忍受（版主判断），版主会选择保留或推迟一段时间，待告一段落后删除。

对于1、2、4条，没有商量的余地；对于3，因为判断起来，不同会员有不同的标准，如对版主操作有不同意见，可以向版主提出。

尽量减少

Might I ask how to quantify the amount, the degree and the objectivity? Seriously ask it, not kidding. Pleae kindly comment on it, dear Ban zhu.

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-4-7 16:33:51编辑过]