ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1468|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG198看不懂后面的解释

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-3 15:22:00 | 只看该作者

OG198看不懂后面的解释

198. Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.


(A)  they had in their previous campaigns


(B)  their previous campaigns had had


(C)  they had for any previous campaign


(D)in their previous campaigns


(E) for any previous campaign



答案是选E的,OG后面的解释我完全看不懂。



If than is followed by a clause referring to army, the subject of that clause must be singular (it). Furthermore, the verb of that clause will need to be in the past perfect form (had had) because it refers to a time before the simple past of entered. Finally, the preposition/or is more precise than in because supplies are gathered/or an upcoming campaign. Choices A and C incorrectly use the plural they and the simple past had. Moreover, A uses the less precise in. Choices D and E wisely dispense with the full clause and use a simple prepositional phrase. D, however, uses the imprecise in and the plural their. Only E, the best choice, avoids all the errors mentioned above.



有谁可以帮助下嘛?than后面要是单数,为啥?

沙发
发表于 2005-3-3 15:41:00 | 只看该作者
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-3-3 16:10:00 | 只看该作者

thanks

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 13:40
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部