Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang like socks on a clothesline.
每次做到with的题目 就很头疼不知道他到底在修饰什么
最近看一些帖子 说说心得
首先with引导的复合结构 他的逻辑主语 不一定是主句主语 千万不能通过简单的逻辑主语来判断
with的复合结构 我认为他在GMAT里面 大多都是以状语的形式出现的 状语是干嘛的 修饰动作的 如果宾语发生了动作 可不可以用with来修饰呢 当i然是可以的举个例子
Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang like socks on a clothesline. A saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang B saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs were hanging C saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging D seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging E seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs have hung
题目选D
with arms and legs hanging就做了修饰monkeys sleeping的状语
但with的用法毕竟比较复杂 至于with ares and legs hanging 有没有修饰visitors (have) seen的歧义 我想 还是有的吧
曼哈顿说whose只能就近修饰 那么ABE 已经被淘汰了 只能留下with 这种相对较好的用法了 因为一个根本不能指代猴子 一个可以指代 肯定是选后者啦
而且句子看多了 with有逗号的 基本上都是去当状语了 和ving有点像了 但是也不排除想做定语修饰宾语的 不过这种我就没见过对的 With the cost of wireless service plummeting in the last year and mobile phones becoming increasingly common, many people are now using their mobile phones to make calls across a wide region at night and on weekends, when numerous wireless companies provide unlimited airtime for a relatively small monthly fee.
这句就是做的原因状语
没有逗号的 就去当定语修饰就近名词 这种情况不多 而且用不好会有歧义
看with在修饰什么关键还是找中心语 和中心语的谓语 一般像猴子挂树这种实属少见
做过的最多的也就是只有一套主谓结构的 with显然是去修饰他们去了 这个时候如果发现句意里面 with去作定语修饰宾语那就必然错了
In 1988, the Council on Economic Priorities began publishing Shopping for a Better World, with the simple thesis of consumers having the power to change companies by the simple expedient of refusing to buy.
像这个例子 with后面的东西 要去修饰 前文the Council on Economic Priorities began,with后面的内容是在修饰 Shopping for a Better World, 这本书的内容 当然错了
结合句意 才是王道 with复合结构不太擅长做定语 做状语也要谨慎选择
也正是因为with 复合结构的复杂 GMAT 才经常把他归为累赘 但是突然有一天出现了 你可不能不会用啊
如果哪里说的不对请指正啊 我再修改