daisy的写作楼

daisy333

914一战 综合good 独立fair 24分

二战还在艰苦的刷考位中。。。但是作文要每天练起来！要求不高 求二战上25就好~

daisy333

810占座 综合tpo1  独立 modern society has become more complex, so it is essential for the young people to have the ability to plan and organize

daisy333

综合 TPO 1
Reading material illustrated the advantages of offering employees four workweek with 80 percent salaries from three aspects. However, the lecture generally listed three arguments one by one to make the points in the reading passage doubtful.

Firstly, on the contrary to the reading material that four days workweek option would increase company’s profits, the lecture claimed that four days workweek option might instead increase company’s costs. Offering workers four days workweek required company to hire more employees on account of ensuring the same amount of work would be done. A lot more money, including hiring costs, training fees and medical fees, would be spent if company add more employees. Moreover, the company should spend much more money in enlarging its office space and increasing office utilities.

Second, reading made a point that this option would increase labor demand, thus the unemployment rate of the whole society would fall. The lecture disputed this point by stating that although workers could reduce the workweek from five days to four days, their work loads might not be reduced by the demand of company. Company might inforce the workers to do as same work loads in five work days as in four days. So, the workers could be required to do the same work but just earned 80 percent of salaries of the former and the labor demand would not change due to this option.

Last but not the least, the reading stated that one more day off provided workers more time with families and enjoy their interests. However, the lecture raise the issue that four days work for a worker might be risky. The lecture assumed that company would still prefer normally managers who work five days to ensure everything is in charge. That is to say, workers who work only four days might lose advancement chances in their career life and promotion opportunities, or even get fired in priority when the company is in trouble.


Words：327
先掐时间写只写了250+ 然后自己改了下就感觉超字数了。。。

daisy333

独立Modern society has become more complex,so it is essential for the young people to have the ability to plan and organize.

As the rapid development of economic and technology, people nowadays get involved in a more complex society, which includes explosive information, intertwined social relationship and multitasks. Compared to the ancient people who have not many accesses to the outer world, people today, especially young people, are facing the world more directly and also communicating with others frequently. Under this circumstances, I believe, like so many successful CEOs do, planning and organizing abilities will help young people to fit in the modern society.

First of all, ability to plan and organize can save people's time and energy to digest a lot more informations from emails, mobile phones or other colleagues. Thousands pieces of news and messages swarm into our mailboxes, mobile phones everyday. Will we be drown into the information ocean and waste great of time in it? At this time, ability to organize and classify the information enable us to focus on the real significant information and to obtain valid information efficiently. A uncle of mine is a HR in a multinational company. He emphasizes the ability to organize the information of employees, because he thinks that a well-organized employee can achieve more workload during the same time and the ability to save time and energy are valuable to a company. That is to say, the ability to plan and organize is also an edge for young people to compete in modern companies.

Secondly, modern society that always put young people in a multitask environment requires young people to be well-planned and well-organized. People in modern society have more social roles. A employee in a company may also is a student in the nearby college. Not like ancient people who just need to hunt and feed themself, young people nowadays have to study in various field or work for live at the same time to adapt complex modern society. People under such pressure will be put in a chaos and hurry condition except he or she have rational plans in advance. A partner in our group, for example, is working at the ETS organization while she is also a student in college and is preparing a exam at the same time. She not only finished her job very well at the work but also achieved the tasks for her exam preparation everyday. At first I thought that this is a impossible multitask for everyone, then after I read about her everyday plan, everything makes sense. She makes rational and detailed plan everyday, which lists every task and the time that every task should takes. What she does everyday is follow the plan and check the task one by one. Plan makes multitask organized and easy done.

Last but not least, when facing complex relationship network, young people nowadays have to plan their time to meet different people and organize their network to make the most use of their relationship. Social networking become more and more essential for young people, and the more people you link, the more good opportunity you gain . For instance, almost every website of first-level college in the United State has a catalog called alumni, who had finished their study and started new career life. Plan to contact alumni and obtain valuable information can be a big step for every young people.

In conclusion, in this complex society, planning and organizing skills are primary to young people.

Word:560

橙圆

改好啦~~

小蘑菇开始打怪

综合 TPO 1
Reading material illustrated the advantages of offering employees four workweek with 80 percent salaries from three aspects. However, the lecture generally listed three arguments one by one to make the points in the reading passage doubtful.

Firstly, on the contrary to the reading material that four days workweek option would increase company’s profits, the lecture claimed that four days workweek option might instead increase company’s costs. Offering workers four days workweek required company to hire more employees on account of ensuring the same amount of work would be done. A lot more money, including hiring costs, training fees and medical fees, would be spent if company add more employees. Moreover, the company should spend much more money in enlarging its office space and increasing office utilities.

Second, reading made a point that this option would increase labor demand, thus the unemployment rate of the whole society would fall. The lecture disputed this point by stating that although workers could reduce the workweek from five days to four days, their work loads might not be reduced by the demand of company. Company might inforce (enforece?) the workers to do as same work loads in five work days as in four days. So, the workers could be required to do the same work but just earned 80 percent of salaries of the former and the labor demand would not change due to this option.（我听到的意思大概是：the company will ask their employees to finish the same amount of work within four workdays. sometimes employees may need to do overtime job to meet the expectation of the company.)

Last but not the least, the reading stated that one more day off provided workers more time with families and enjoy their interests. However, the lecture raise the issue that four days work for a worker might be risky. The lecture assumed that company would still prefer normally managers who work five days to ensure everything is in charge. That is to say, workers who work only four days might lose advancement chances in their career life and promotion opportunities, or even get fired in priority when the company is in trouble.

我只听了听力部分，还原的还是很好的~格式不错~
写得很好~！

daisy333

橙圆 发表于 2014-8-12 17:55
改好啦~~

真是太太太感谢！！！

daisy333

小蘑菇开始打怪 发表于 2014-8-12 23:16
综合 TPO 1
Reading material illustrated the advantages of offering employees four workweek with 80 p ...

感谢蘑菇！感觉综合比独立是好写一些哈

daisy333

占座【20140815】
独立 Modern agriculture method damage the environment, but providing food for the growing population around the world is more important than protecting the environment.

When it comes to modern agriculture method, some people hold the views that it damage the environment in some degree, so it should not be supported. However, others, including me, argued that modern agriculture method could not be replaced because maintaining the demand of growing population is way more important than protecting the environment.

Food is essential for human beings to live. And we must admit that modern agriculture provide us a more efficient way to produce food. In some part of world, such as some countries in Africa, are not use modern agriculture method to produce food and thousands of people died there because of hunger. So if we abandon modern agriculture to protect environment, a number of people may suffer from starvation, which is a really bad signal for human development. Imagine that where there is people died of hunger, who cares about environment?

Moreover, compared to environment, food has more direct influence to people. Everybody need to eat everyday, but the environmental damage which caused by modern agriculture method is too subtle to influence people’s life. Modern agriculture may causes the soil lose nutritions and takes place the area where were used to plant trees. But take a glance at the history of human development, that is the pattern how human beings survive and develop. Only when we ensure the food supply for people, we stop and protect environment. We must make food as a priority.

Sacrificing food supply to protect our environment is just putting the cart before the house. And we do have many other methods to protect environment. Reducing car uses is an alternative example. When I travel to York, a city of England, I saw model bikes in different colors were put on the both sides of road to encourage people to ride bike instead of to drive cars. With less car uses, we can breathe more clear air without abandoning modern agriculture method. Modern agriculture method and environment protection are not mutually exclusively alternatives that can not be exist at the same time.

Protecting environment is significant, but we should first use modern agriculture method that supplies enough food for growing population all over the world to ensure that there have people full and energetic to protect environment.

words:378
字数好像少了点，但希望结构上有些改善

daisy333

占座【20140816】
独立： 政府应该在医疗保障还是环境治理上花费更多精力

There is a widespread debate about which should government spend more energy and money on, medical care or environmental conservation. Considering limited energy and budget that government has, some of our citizens hope our government to attribute more to the medical care system, which is not very mature at the present. However, from a long-term perspective, others, including me, place environmental conservation in advance position for following reasons.

Admittedly, medical care is urgently needed because people are getting more and more vulnerable against diseases and some rarely diseases have emerged. But within the advanced development of medical technology and method, why there are still the same amount of or even more patients in the hospital waiting to be cured? The answer is: because environmental deterioration. Environmental deterioration, such as air pollution, makes people more easily to develop diseases, such as cardiopulmonary. A famous professor in Fudan University, for example, died of cancer. In her late life, she recalled that the environment she lived were seriously air polluted. And her doctor said that air pollution around the place she lives is one of major cause of cancer. So, just spending more energy and financial support on medical care is not enough. Concentrating on environmental improvement is the radical way for government to improve people’s life quality. Otherwise, medical care need will like a black hole, absorbing endless energy and money.

Moreover, environmental conservation influences wider range of people. A certain amount of money and time spent on environmental improvement may effect whole community people via improve their live environment. However, the same amount of money and time used for improving medical care system may only change a minority of people’s life. As everyone is born equal, government should do more things cared about the whole community instead of several patients. This is the same principle as parents always meet all children’s need and then consider each single child’s requirement.

Both medical care improvement and environmental conservation are essential for our people. But owing to the reasons I mentioned above, concentrating more on the environmental conservation is a wiser choice for our government.

word：359
字数越来越少了。。。之前忘记看时间写得好匆忙，写到后面实在憋不粗了TAT