Alex是来打酱油滴——第二季

chasedreamabc

loverony713 发表于 2014-9-18 21:27
你的综合呢！！！昨天的居然敢不写！！！！！ps我还是想问第一个反驳论点 里面有一句话是这样的“ but the  ...

我错了，这就写，然后详细研究一下你的红字

loverony713

chasedreamabc 发表于 2014-9-18 22:17
我错了，这就写，然后详细研究一下你的红字

小盆友加油 话说我的综合真的烂成一坨翔....

chasedreamabc

TPO26 综合

The lecture arguesthat zebra mussels can still threat to freshwater fish populations in North Americaby the point of the reading passage.

First and most, theprofessor believes that people now have enough knowledge to prevent theinvasion effectively. For example, in the reading passage, the ship filledballast water and emptied it to North America’s shores. But in the listening, thenew way is that people can empty the beginning ballast water when it is stillin the ocean and then refresh the sea water, which contain salt can kill zebramussels.

Second, thereading passage says that zebra mussels can dominate a new area because theyadapt variety of conditions and have fewer predators. However, in the lectureprofessor points out that this phenomenon is only in the beginning. Now, in Europe,aquatic birds notice new food and therefore prevent the innovation.

Finally and last, zebramussels do not decline the populations of overall fish. They would reduce the planktonfish, but would also provide nutrients for bottom-feeding fish and can improvethe numbers of the other fish.

chasedreamabc

9.19 独立

It is a common sensethat our government should provide better living condition for their citizens suchas the higher education and advance medical care. In fact, publictransportation is also a very crucial part that can affect people’s daily lives.Therefore, some people suggest that in order to construct a faster and safertransport system, the government should provide free public transportation toindividuals. Personally, I totally agree with this statement and my reasons arelisted as follow.

To begin with, itis very obvious that people can save a lot of expense if they do not have topay for the public transportation. That is to say, in people’s daily lives,especially in some big cities, workers who live far away from their companiesoften spend a large amount of money on commute which seems to be one of themajor costs in their lives. If they can save the cost of the transportation, itcan help them to save money for the raining day. For example, people who livein New York have to spend at least six bucks on the return underground ticketper day. However, the fast food lunch such as a sandwich would only cost themtwo to three bucks. It is quite easy to see if people can save money if theycan have the free ride. In other words, if the government can provide them withfree underground travel, it will help them to save their incomes to use it insome special occasions.

What is more, ifpeople can have free public transportation, it can both benefit our roadcondition and environment. By that I mean, if people can take the publictransportation without paying the bills, there will be numerous individualschoose to take them rather than drive their own cars. As a result, there willbe fewer vehicles on the road which would lead to less traffic congestion andless vehicle exhaust. Thus, our cities would have more clear streets andfresher air. In fact, many airports have these kinds of services. For example,Beijing International airports provide their passengers with free undergrounds andbuses. Thus this airport never had traffic jams since people do not need todrive their own cars to come here, of course, is much better than in main urbanarea of Beijing. In sum, it is a great idea for both the transportation andenvironment if citizens can take the public transportation for free.

As for me, Itotally believe that it is a great policy for both government and citizens ifpeople can pay nothing for the public transportation.

loverony713

chasedreamabc 发表于 2014-9-20 22:04
9.19 独立
It is a common sensethat our government should provide better living condition for their c ...

9.19 独立

chasedreamabc

TPO28
Both the reading passage and the listening material discussthe authenticity of the story that Peary has been to the North Pole. Althoughthe reading supports that claim, the lecturer refuses to believe it with threestrong arguments.

The reading passage presents the fact that the committeeconstituted by the National Geographic Society eventually proved the truth ofPeary’s claim through an investigation of the record as well as the facilitiesof that trip. However, the speaker casts doubt on the objectivity of thatconclusion with the arguments that several friends of Peary who financed histrip to the North Pole were included in that committee and the investigationwas only two-day period with the careless examination of his records.

Moreover, the reading displays the evidence that antherexplorer, Tom Avery, succeeded to reach the North Pole with less time under thesimilar conditions experienced by Peary, which indicates the possibility ofPeary’s successful exploration. In contrast, the lecturer argues that theexperience of Avery could not soundly support the probability of Peary’ssuccess due to the significant differences between the two journey that includethe varied weather condition as well as the methods of food supply.

Furthermore, the author of the reading states that thephotographs taken by Peary at the North Pole could verify his story, since theposition of the Sun estimated through evaluating the shadows in the pictureswas in accordance with the natural rule. On the contrary, the listening rebutsthat statement by pointing out that the quality of those pictures is in a poorcondition due to the fact that they were taken by the primitive camera and seemto be unclear after nearly a hundred years, which means the measurement basedon those photos could not be definitely accurate and the position of the Sun inthem could not be determined without doubts.

dayxin

好厉害！！模仿不来啊

chasedreamabc

这种话题我也写不好啊，虽说以前貌似写过类似的东西

loverony713

9-20 patient作文修改

chasedreamabc

TPO27
In the reading passage, the author claims three main  causes of the Little  Ice Age. The speaker in the lecturer, however,  argued that the information is  already out of date.            
First, the author stated that the disruption of ocean  currents in the Gulf  Stream might cause global climate change. However,  the speaker argued that in  that way cooling would have only taken  place in North America and Europe,  instead of happening worldwide.  Since the climate change also happened in  Southern hemisphere, the  ocean currents theory cannot explain the Little Ice  Age.
            
Second, the volcano theory. According to the speaker,  if volcano eruption  really generated enough dust to affect global  climate, people would have  observed stunning visual effects, such as  colorful sunset and gray or brown  snow. Since there were no records for  those phenomena, the volcano theory cannot  be regarded as the main  cause of the Little Ice Age.
            
Third, the author alleged that the decrease of  population might cause  cooling effect. Since more farmland turned back  into forests, more greenhouse  gas would have been absorbed by trees.  However, this argument could not be  justified, since there was not  enough time for this effect to work. Forests were  soon being cut down  to meet the need of growing back population. In this sense,  the  short-time appearance of forests could not take responsibility f or the   Little Ice Age.