求组队 改作文

xhbhxhbh

TPO1 Integrated writing
In the passage ,there is  an agrument that offering a four-day week work,  will do good to both  the individual and the cooperation respectively.In
the lecture , however ,the  professor holds another point of view.
First, offering four-day week job may cost more. Since the company
would invest more to the office space and more computers, this would
of course cut down the profit of the company . In addition , if they hire
new employees to accomplish the work ,there would be a sum of money
putting into the hiring and training process, this is another aspect of cost  the company more . Further , if they hire new employees they must  
pay for their medicine fees, this is the third  facets that costing the
company more.These  all contradicts what claims in the passage that
a four-day week work would decrease the cost  of the company and
benefit the company a lot .
Secondly, a four-day week work don't nessary mean an increase in
more employment . In the lecture ,the professor holds that ,in order to
decrease the hiring cost ,the company may not want to hire more
employees ,the reasons are already stated as before , and this will
end up working overtime. And also ,the employer would increase  
their expections ,hoping that the present employee could do the  same
amout of time in the four-day week works. This would obviously
increase the pressure of the employees. But in the passage , it maintains that ,a four-day week policy would increase the employment ,and make the employee feel at ease ,and improve their life quality.However, the lecture refutes both of the saying in the passage.
       
Finaly , offing a four-day week policy impede the career development  and wouldn't reduce the cost of the company . To start with , this policy also end up reducing the  ability of the workers ,since the less
work time . and in a economic downturn , they might be first to lost
their jobs ,and there will be less promotion opportunities for them
comparing to thier five-day counterparts . This is also completely
contradicts what has claimed in the passage that  the employee
will benefit from the policy and enjoy a high quality life.