ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1543|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG13 SC87 关于修饰关系的不理解

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-4-6 10:00:14 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
87. According toscientists who monitored its path, an expanding cloud of energizedparticles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a large storm in the magneticfield that surrounds Earth, which brightened the Northern Lights and alsopossibly knocking out a communicationssatellite.

(A) an expandingcloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a largestorm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, which brightened the NorthernLights and also possibly knocking

(B) an expandingcloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun was what recently triggered alarge storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, and it brightened theNorthern Lights and also possibly knocked

(C) an expandingcloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recently triggered a largestorm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, brightening the NorthernLights and possibly knocking

(D) a large stormin the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, recently triggered by an expandingcloud of energized particles, brightened the Northern Lights and it possiblyknocked

(E) a large stormin the magnetic field surrounding Earth was recently triggered by an expandingcloud of energized particles, brightening the Northern Lights and it possiblyknocked


1、针对这道题目,我能看出来是平行结构。看论坛中有人介绍,从三个动词triggerbrightenknock之间的关系不难看出,后两者应该是trigger的间接后果,应该用SVO,ING的形式,且后两者平行。此说法如何理解?全都是这样的么?

2、关于修饰关系,C选项中:

an expanding cloud of energized particles ejected from the Sun recentlytriggered a large storm in the magnetic field that surrounds Earth, brighteningthe Northern Lights and possibly knocking

怎么理解这个brightening andknocking修饰关系?

brightening and knocking 从内容上讲是修饰storm的,但是从语法上来看,照我的理解,要么就近修饰earth要么就是修饰整个句子的逻辑主语cloud,目前我现在想不出来怎么直接就是带着这个brightening and knocking
求大神解答!!!

正确选项:C


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-4-6 19:31:35 | 只看该作者
我觉得这个brightening and knocking修饰前面的整个句子,Ving表示结果
板凳
发表于 2014-4-9 02:46:53 | 只看该作者
ing form could be used to modify the entire clause ,as long as the entire clause converted into a noun phrase could function as the subject of verb that in now in ING form ,this use of the ING form works best when you want to express the result of main clause

妈蛋 ,我一开始竟然选了D ,看来能用主动结构,就尽量别用被动结构,另外我感觉在gmat里,comma+ing form,很多情况下都是考查 ing form,作为表达主句的结果
地板
发表于 2014-9-26 14:32:28 | 只看该作者
bearhawk 发表于 2014-4-9 02:46
ing form could be used to modify the entire clause ,as long as the entire clause converted into a no ...

D最主要的不是被动的原因,brighten和knock 形式不平行,这才是硬伤
5#
发表于 2014-9-26 14:34:39 | 只看该作者
bearhawk 发表于 2014-4-9 02:46
ing form could be used to modify the entire clause ,as long as the entire clause converted into a no ...

而且D中 被动语态也没有be动词啊,这标准吗?这个我不太肯定,求牛牛解答
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 13:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部