ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1890|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-14-2-2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-1-17 23:36:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-14-2-2

2. Garbage in this neighborhood probably will not be collected until Thursday this week. Garbage is usually collected here on Wednesdays, and the garbage collectors in this city are extremely reliable. However, Monday was a public holiday, and after a public holiday that falls on a Monday, garbage throughout the city is supposed to be collected one day later than usual.


The argument proceeds by


(A) treating several pieces of irrelevant evidence as though they provide support for the conclusion


(B) indirectly establishing that one thing is likely to occur by directly ruling out all of the alternative possibilities


(C) providing information that allows application of a general rule to a specific case


(D) generalizing about all actions of a certain kind on the basis of a description of one such action



(E) treating something that is probable as though it were inevitable


answer is C, but what I want to know is why not B? thanks a lot  first!


沙发
发表于 2005-1-18 18:30:00 | 只看该作者

B) indirectly establishing that one thing is likely to occur by directly ruling out all of the alternative possibilities


题干并没有体现出红色字体的意思--并没有采用排除其它可能性(清洁工倒班,垃圾车故障等等)的方法来确定答案,因此我不选它。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-19 21:01:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用蜡笔小西在2005-1-18 18:30:00的发言:

B) indirectly establishing that one thing is likely to occur by directly ruling out all of the alternative possibilities


题干并没有体现出红色字体的意思--并没有采用排除其它可能性(清洁工倒班,垃圾车故障等等)的方法来确定答案,因此我不选它。


Garbage in this neighborhood probably will not be collected until Thursday this week. Garbage is usually collected here on Wednesdays, and the garbage collectors in this city are extremely reliable

this statement, I think, seems to rule out other cause!

地板
发表于 2005-1-19 23:46:00 | 只看该作者

(B) indirectly establishing that one thing is likely to occur by directly ruling out all of the alternative possibilities

B would sound more plausible if these two words switch positions

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-1-20 18:22:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用chelseayang在2005-1-19 23:46:00的发言:

(B) indirectly establishing that one thing is likely to occur by directly ruling out all of the alternative possibilities


B would sound more plausible if these two words switch positions



thanks for your explanation. it is very accurate!! I C. you must be NN!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-9 20:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部