修饰 OG DT SC 43 Despite the increasing number of

caroline莲莲

Despite the increasing number of women graduating from law school and passing bar examinations, the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent.
(A) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women have not risen to a comparable extent
(B) the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms have not risen comparably
(C) the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably
(D) yet the proportion of women judges and partners at major law firms has not risen to a comparable extent
(E) yet the proportion of judges and partners at major law firms who are women has not risen comparably

正确答案C

问题：
1. 相比较而言C是最好的答案，但有个疑问judges and partners at major law firms who are women ，who are women不应该作为noun modifier需要遵守touch原则从而修饰firms吗？但这显然是不对的；
2. Women judges and partners，OG认为Women只修饰judges。我认为也可以是Women (judges) and (partners)。当然，即使这样，那么就是存在歧义，还是不够好。单纯想知道Women (judges) and (partners)这种形式对不对

谢谢大家

caroline莲莲

好沉一个帖子

carmensh

up~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~``

potentialwjy117

我也有这样的疑问.到底什么情况可以跳跃指代呢...
一说是看逻辑关系,但这道题里如果WHO指代FIRMS岂不是会引起歧义嘛

ubchouserent

顶一下，同问