ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 4299|回复: 12
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC悬赏令] OG13 SC 115 求助啊~~~~~~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-8-8 17:51:11 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
115. Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated international disputes over uninhabited islands.
(A) Because there are provisions of the new maritime code that provide that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, they have already stimulated
(B) Because the new maritime code provides that even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, it as already stimulated
(C) Even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, already stimulating
(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, this has already stimulated
(E) Because even tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas under provisions of the new maritime code, which is already stimulating

C选项OG 说
the sentence does not make clear what is stimulating … disputes.可是在这里这个Ving phrase不能做结果状语表伴随吗?而且under provisions of the new maritime code是属于none modifier就要遵循touch rule,是这样解释吗?求nn解释啊
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
推荐
发表于 2013-8-21 08:12:21 | 只看该作者
"under provisions of the new maritime code" 按照原文意思应该做整个句子的状语,但是按照C选项,摆在sea areas 之后,就有可能被理解为修饰限定sea areas (sea areas as defined under provisions of the new maritime code), 这个与原意不符,会引起混淆
沙发
发表于 2013-8-8 18:00:49 | 只看该作者
伴随状语的主语和主句的主语一致。
原文的主语应该是code,而不是tiny islets
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-8 18:05:17 | 只看该作者
哦~~我以为做结果状语时只要能表示是前一个句子的结果,就不用管主语是否一致了~~~~~~~~~谢谢NN了~~~~~~~~~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2013-8-31 18:10:31 | 只看该作者
感谢感谢~~~~~
6#
发表于 2013-8-31 21:44:53 | 只看该作者
--------------------
7#
发表于 2014-8-16 15:27:12 | 只看该作者
B选项中 it指代new maritime code 可以指代这么远吗!= =我觉得我好像跟modifier的touch结构弄混了。。。代词木有说是非要紧挨所指代的词吧,所谓的指代不清是不是说一个代词前有几个n并且都可以make sense?
混乱了,求指正= =
8#
发表于 2014-8-16 16:02:17 | 只看该作者
mengzj 发表于 2014-8-16 15:27
B选项中 it指代new maritime code 可以指代这么远吗!= =我觉得我好像跟modifier的touch结构弄混了。。。代 ...

这句话可以这样理解:因为某某干了什么事,所以它。。。。所以it指代new maritime code.听起来挺顺的

还有C选项,完全颠倒了句子的重心,从句变主句了,主句变成分词结构了
9#
发表于 2014-8-17 06:47:01 | 只看该作者
ashlyzhu 发表于 2014-8-16 16:02
这句话可以这样理解:因为某某干了什么事,所以它。。。。所以it指代new maritime code.听起来挺顺的

还 ...

嗯O(∩_∩)O谢谢
10#
发表于 2015-4-9 03:23:42 | 只看该作者
"这句话可以这样理解:因为某某干了什么事,所以它。。。。所以it指代new maritime code.听起来挺顺的"

但是D选项的代词-this 也离的很远,为什么OG说他指代不明?求哪位指点
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 03:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部