TPO _ 03 综合作文 --------------------字数304-----------------2013.10.09
The lecturer claims that all the information of the reading passage is true, and pronounces the conclusion that this paint is really the work as Rembrandt. Then the lecturer gives some reasons to explain the doubts from the reading passage.
According to the reading passage, there are some strange things in this paint. For instance, thewoman in the portrait is wearing a servant's cap but wearing a luxurious furcollar which is unable to afford by a servant. Experts think it was a mistakethat could not happen in Rembrandt's work. The lecture, by contrast, explainsthat the fur collar was painted by other people after the original portrait 100years. So it actually has no fur collar on the woman and the way of the woman'sdressing is consistent.
The second point of doubt between the lecture and the reading passage concerns the light in thewoman's face which is reflected from below. The reading passage says that if there is dark fur collar on the woman, the light in the woman's face will not berealistic, which was a obvious error had never been made by Rembrandt. In fact, the lecture points out that the original painting is just a light fur collar butnot a dark one. So the light collar can reflect the light to the woman's face.In this way, the light and shadow in the portrait is realistic.
Finally, althoughthe reading passage suggests that there are some pieces of wood blued together in the painting's panel, the lecture shows that some people enlarged the panel inthis way because they probably wanted to make this paint grand and valuable. Moreover, the original panel is also found from the same tree as another work of Rembrandt. Thus, the lecturer confirms the painting is really painted by Rembrandt. |