代词指代 大家火速前来啊……

meesh

enkyklios 发表于 2013-8-12 12:12
平常训练时最大可能的搞清楚，然后做题的时候用一些技巧。这个these问题我还要再查一查资料。很多时候一 ...

好的！～～

echolove

zhenhao
xiex

marshadis

谢谢分享~~~

Vivian1091

。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。

Vivian1091

他们的例子：Because it was robbed last month, the door to the house is locked.此处it 在从句中做主语，此处它优先指代the door，把the door带入从句后，发现逻辑出现错误，因此指代错误，这个句子错误



我觉得这个例句的解释并不能让人满意
这个句子的错误并不是因为it优先指代door，而是因为it没有指代。这和介词短语在句首是不同的

您这里说的 it不能指代door，是不是因为，it是状语从句中的，the door是主句主语。但如果是介词短语的话，主句中的成分可以指代介词短语和整个介词结构？这个语法点的规律是什么？下面的例子是不是也是您这里归纳的这一点？

关于D选项this不能裸奔所引发的知识点啊（Ron）：
Because there are provisionsof the new maritime code that provide that even tinv islets can be the basisfor claims to the fisheries and oil fields of large sea areas, thev havealready stimulated international disputes overuninhabited islands.

(B) Because the new maritime code provides thateven tiny islets can be the basis for claims to the fisheries and oil fields oflarge sea areas, it has already stimulated
(D) Because even tiny islets can be the basisfor claims to the fisheries and oil fields of largesea areas under provisions of the newmaritime code, this has already stimulated
OA B.
choice (d) uses "this" as a standalone pronoun. that's pretty muchnever acceptable in a formal written sentence.

if you're going to use "this", you shoulduse it as an adjective: this thing,this finding, this statistic, etc.

also, here's some "extra credit" knowledge:
there ARE constructions that can stand for the abstract information in anentire clause (unlike pronouns, which are limited to standing for actualnouns). chief among these are the COMMA + NOUN modifiers.
however, the presence of "because" at the beginning of choice (d)would preclude the use of those modifiers as well.代词指代的都是actual none，有一些结构可以指代前面整个句子的abstractinfo，主要的就是“，+none”结构，但是，如果有because出现 就不能用 这类modifier了。

here's an example:
studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y, a findingthat has shocked most observers.
studies have shown that X is 60 percent of Y; thisfinding has shocked most observers.

--> both correct. note that "a finding", following the comma, or"this finding", standing alone after the semicolon, stands for theentirety of the clause that comesbefore it; you couldn't use "which" here,because "which" would automatically refer to Y.

because studieshave shown that X is 60 percent of Y, this finding has shocked mostobservers.
--> incorrect. thepresence of "because" at the beginning of the first clause means youcan't use "this finding" anymore.
[这个错误的结构和D是一样的】
i don't have any idea what the actual rule is here, but i do know with 100%certainty that these constructions are allowed and disallowed respectively.

xiaoshuo199183

总结得非常好~感谢~

鞋鞋鞋

谢谢楼主分享。。。。。。。。

jjjhhh123

~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yuggy

thanks for sharing

meesh

顶！！！！