ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1287|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

LSAT-6-3-1

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-11 21:46:00 | 只看该作者

LSAT-6-3-1

1. Roses always provide a stunning display of color, but only those flowers that smell sweet are worth growing in a garden. Some roses have no scent. Which one the following conclusions can be properly drawn from the passage?


(A) Some flowers which provides a stunning display of color are not worth growing in a garden.


(B) All flowers with no scent provide a stunning display of color.


(c) Some flowers which are worth growing in a garden have no scent.


(D) Some roses which smell sweet are not worth growing in a garden.


(E) No sweet-smelling flower is worth growing in a garden unless it provides a stunning display of color.


A是答案。我也同意。但是D为什么不对呢。从题目看“grow in garden"是"smell sweet"的充分条件,smell sweet是grow in garden的必要条件,那么D说有一些smell sweet的玫瑰不grow in gardent也是可能的啊。


谢谢解答!

沙发
发表于 2004-12-12 04:52:00 | 只看该作者
问题是选项是must be true,不是possibly true。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-4 05:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部