006 If you could change one important thing about your hometown, what would you change? Use reasons and specific examples to support your answer. Change the environment 1 people feel more comfortable 2 benefit people’s health 3 attracting people and company
One thing I wanna change of my hometown might be the environment there.My hometown,as a city based on industy,does not have a satisfied living condition.A growing number of people are complaining about the air pollution and the sand-wind,which make them feel awful.So a changing in the environment might has become a emergency event for my home town.
Firstly,no one will deny the basic fact that a city with good environment is more popular among people.Fresh air, blue sky,clear water and clean broad roads surrounded by green trees are what people want.This is one of the reasons why many people choose live in a relatively small city,instead of big cities like Beijing and Shanghai,which are filled with polluted air and traffic jam.And these bigg cities are trying hard to improve their environment now.So concidering the bad air quality in rabbish-filled road in my home town,it is necessary to do something to create a better living environment.
Besides, a better environment will for sure benefit people’s health. Fresh air can contribute to a better lung is one reason,another and more effective one is that people would be willing to take a walk or other exercises outside.There’s no doubt that many diseases are resulted from sitting in front of the computer all day and taking no exercises.And more exercises not only will do good to people’s physical health,but pyschological health as well ,for it can sometimes make families and friends communicate more frequently.
What’s more,a clean and beautiful environment could become a siginificant resource of a city for it might appeal travellers and companies from other cities.Dalian and Qsingdao are cities famous for beautiful city environment ,which have become important travealling city in china and are developing fast in economy.Industry is now the foundamental economic resource of my hometown,maybe adding of travelling would contribute to a better economic structure.And if some big companies settle down in my hometown,more job opportunities will be provided,and a rise in economy will somehow come into being.
From what have been discussed above,we can safely draw a conclusion that an improvement of environment of a city will benefit both its people and economy and make it a charmy city attracting people from other places.So what I wanna change of my hometown is its environment.
一篇综合写作TPO3 有关Paiting是否属于某个画家的讨论 用的神力模版 感觉此模版不是特别适合事实性论据的反驳 The reading passage explores the issue of whether a painting thought to be painted by Rembrandt is in deed his work.The professor’s lecture deals with the same issue.However, he thinks that the painting actually belongs to Rembrant,which contraddicts what the reading states.And in the lecture,he uses three specific points to support his idea, To begin with, even though the reading suggests that the woman in the painting is misdressed,which couldn’t be a mistake that Rembranbt would make,the professor argues in the lecture that this is because it is not the original painting.The professor refers to a study made by a group of people under the help of X-ray that someone painted on top of the original one after 100 years.And the fur collar was added by the person who might have a purpose to make the painting more valuable.Obviously,the professor’s argument disproves its counterpart in the reading. Moreover,despite the statement in the reading that the light and shadow does not fit in the painting,which implies it is not painted by Rembranbt,the professor offered evidence which could disprove it.The group of people who discovered the layer painted on the original painting states that in the original painting the woman is wearing a clear white collar,which could reflect light to the woman’s face,so the painting’s light and shadow fit well actually.Then the painting meets people’s expection of Rembrants’s style perfectly,which disproves the reading’s point again. Finally,the professor asserts that the banal the author of the reading claimed to be glued from pieces of wood was also enlarged by the person who changed it and the original one is just one piece.What’s more,the professor states the wood is the same one with another painting of Rembrandt,which obviously strengthen his argument that the painting comes from Rembrandt.
In couclusion,the professor clearly identifies the weakness in the reading passage and convincingly shows that the central argument in the reading that the painting does not belongs to Rembrant is incorrect.
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2013-3-12 15:41:52
收藏
收藏
楼主
