- UID
- 850481
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2013-1-20
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
wuyile516516 发表于 2014-2-1 09:24
求教下,这个地方为什么不能用who修饰 individual然后发出creates这个动作?我觉得从语法上来说合适
不好意思,现在才看到。
为什么我之前会说人不可能create 这种反应,我理解的是,这个反应是人发出的,而不是create的, 更多的是应该与前面相平行,前面的是 lying produce the reaction, 那么 in turn 从习惯上来说应该讲这个reactions create unconscious physiological . 但是这个理解纯属个人感觉无依据。
以下的千行笔记的,关于从改变原始句语义上来看E选项,你可以看看。
Intended meaning from Choice A:
1. Use of lie detectors is based on a certain assumption. Here is the assumption
2. Lying produces emotional reactions in an individual
3. These emotional reactions then create unconscious physiological responses.
Note that “that clause” in this sentence clearly modifies – emotional reactions. Yes, typically relative pronoun modifiers modify the closest noun. However, they can also modify slightly far away noun when this noun is the head of the noun phrase and when such modification makes sense.(从单复数也可以判断出来)
E选项的分析:
Grammatically Correct but Incorrect choice (E) – Notice how in choice E the test makers have changed the modifier from “that clause” to “who clause”. See, “who” modifiers cannot modify things. They can only modify people. So by changing ‘thing’ modifying modifier to ‘person’ modifying modifier, now automatically the entity being modified changes to “individual”. Now the modifier no longer modifies “emotional reactions”. This changes the meaning. This results in different yet still logical meaning. |
|