ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1972|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og verbal 105题求助!论坛搜遍了脑子还是浆糊~多谢各位!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2013-1-31 00:23:40 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters; infrared radiation, however is invisible because its wavelength--0.1 millimeters--is too long to be registered by the eye.
(A)
(B) however, the wavelength of infrared radiation—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye making it invisible
(C) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long for the eye to register it
(D) however, because the wavelength of infrared radiation is 0.1 millimeters, it is too long for the eye to register and thus invisible
(E) however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long for the eye to register, thus making it invisible










og:A


这层留给同学们看题目~~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2013-1-31 00:33:43 | 只看该作者
The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters; infrared radiation, however is invisible because its wavelength--0.1 millimeters--is too long to be registered by the eye.

A
(B) however, the wavelength of infrared radiation—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye making it invisible
making it invisible-修饰接近的名词,即eye,逻辑意思不符合】
(C) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long for the eye to register it
【我的理解是it多余,在这里去掉就对了,OG解释说 lacks of CLEAR referent,莫非是说it如果指代清晰的话就对了?按照OG 的逻辑,因为its wavelength ,its指代 infrared radiation,所以此处的it 无法指代wavelength,但即使把it 换成wavelength,这句话也还是错误的吧?求教!】
(D) however, because the wavelength of infrared radiation is 0.1 millimeters, it is too long for the eye to register and thus invisible
1.OG 解释说it is imprecise,Thus invisible modifies wavelength, rather than infrared radiation.这里的意思是说,从单复数上来讲it 既可指代wavelength ,又可指代 infrared radiation,所以imprecise;请问,这里的it 可以优先指代主语 wavelength 吗?我的考虑是第一位置是主语,并且og后面关于thus invisible的解释也是基于it指代wavelength的理解来的,这样考虑对吗?】
(E) however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long for the eye to register, thus making it invisible
OG解释: it lacks a clear referent。这里理解无能啊!!!泪!!】


困惑#1.too long for eye 能用吗?在语法上有硬伤吗?还是只能用too long to be

困惑#2.这个题,我理解了好久好久才能理解出这么多。。考场上这样会要命的。求指导下选题的思路啊~


不好意思啊,各位,第一次发帖,不知道说的清不清楚
~其实..这个题我错选了c,可是看了太久太久的解释,我已经忘记我当时为啥会选他了,泪..





板凳
发表于 2013-1-31 08:02:02 | 只看该作者
只说一下我做这道题的方法,分享下。

看到这题,从句型结构,和整个逻辑关系来看,A 和 C无疑是最顺眼的。然后再仔细对比了一下,发现C后面的 it 指代有点问题,所以A 用被动语态就避免了指代问题,无疑A是优选。
地板
发表于 2015-6-1 10:17:03 | 只看该作者
kiwifoodtown 发表于 2013-1-31 08:02
只说一下我做这道题的方法,分享下。看到这题,从句型结构,和整个逻辑关系来看,A 和 C无疑是最顺眼的。然 ...

我想问一下C its wavelength is too long for the eye to register it
因为这句话的主语是its wavelength,所以eye register的不能再是主语,it就是指代的radiation
这么理解it不就没有指代不清的问题了?

还有就是eye register的不应该是radiation而不是wavelength?但A表示的是eye register wavelength。。。这样A不是有问题。。。

怎样也想不明白啊。。希望能解释一下。。
5#
发表于 2015-6-1 17:52:09 | 只看该作者
佩服你的扒坟精神!
说明你不是伸手党。加油!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-28 19:56
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部