- UID
- 551765
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2010-8-1
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
沙发

楼主 |
发表于 2013-1-31 00:33:43
|
只看该作者
The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 millimeters; infrared radiation, however is invisible because its wavelength--0.1 millimeters--is too long to be registered by the eye.
(A) (B) however, the wavelength of infrared radiation—0.1 millimeters—is too long to be registered by the eye making it invisible 【making it invisible-修饰接近的名词,即eye,逻辑意思不符合】 (C) infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength—0.1 millimeters—is too long for the eye to register it 【我的理解是it多余,在这里去掉就对了,OG解释说 lacks of CLEAR referent,莫非是说it如果指代清晰的话就对了?按照OG 的逻辑,因为its wavelength ,中its指代 infrared radiation,所以此处的it 无法指代wavelength,但即使把it 换成wavelength,这句话也还是错误的吧?求教!】 (D) however, because the wavelength of infrared radiation is 0.1 millimeters, it is too long for the eye to register and thus invisible 【1.OG 解释说it is imprecise,Thus invisible modifies wavelength, rather than infrared radiation.这里的意思是说,从单复数上来讲it 既可指代wavelength ,又可指代 infrared radiation,所以imprecise;请问,这里的it 可以优先指代主语 wavelength 吗?我的考虑是第一位置是主语,并且og后面关于thus invisible的解释也是基于it指代wavelength的理解来的,这样考虑对吗?】 (E) however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 millimeters that is too long for the eye to register, thus making it invisible【OG解释: it lacks a clear referent。这里理解无能啊!!!泪!!】
困惑#1.too long for eye 能用吗?在语法上有硬伤吗?还是只能用too long to be
困惑#2.这个题,我理解了好久好久才能理解出这么多。。考场上这样会要命的。求指导下选题的思路啊~
不好意思啊,各位,第一次发帖,不知道说的清不清楚~其实..这个题我错选了c,可是看了太久太久的解释,我已经忘记我当时为啥会选他了,泪..
|
|