ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: zhuang8825
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于prep对于夹心修饰的解释!困惑啊

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2014-8-18 19:08:16 | 只看该作者
写的很好 赞
12#
发表于 2015-7-26 10:54:01 | 只看该作者
1369179610 发表于 2013-1-7 10:14
夹心修饰——夹在句子中间的容易导致歧义的修饰辨别方法:1.S,v+ing..., V+O... 句式中现代分词短语约定俗 ...

问下哇,你举的例子例2,这句话的谓语不是应该是is finding嘛?所以having the ability to analyze为什么不是修饰 is finding 而是修饰develop呢,developed 应该是done结构修饰主语把
13#
发表于 2015-8-19 20:56:25 | 只看该作者
我和你有一模一样的疑问
14#
发表于 2016-1-14 14:47:26 | 只看该作者
blossom1118 发表于 2014-1-9 12:43
请教,谢谢谢谢  如果按楼主的说法,那么gwd3-q22中
On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a cri ...

a crime for 用错介词 排除AB
ron神的话:
the dreaded "because of X VERBing..." construction.

this construction is incorrect if the causal agent (i.e., the thing that the "because" is attributed to) is the VERB.

for instance,

* we laughed all day because of tony walking into the girls' bathroom --> incorrect, because the verb (walking into the bathroom) is the reason why we were laughing all day.
the correct version of this sentence would read we laughed all day because of tony's walking into the girls' bathroom. in other words, if the causal agent is the action (which appears in -ing form), then it must be preceded by a possessive.

* estelle was afraid to move because of a spider sitting on the wall --> correct, because estelle is afraid because of the spider itself, not because of the spider's sitting on the wall.

this sentence should be read as an instance of the latter: it's the law itself that caused the immigrants' problems.
15#
发表于 2016-9-11 15:06:03 | 只看该作者
The yield per acre of coffee berries varies enormously, 【because a single tree, (depending on its size and on climate and altitude)】
这句话分析一下,because a single tree可以看做是The yield per acre of coffee berries varies enormously的解释原因,【because a single tree, (depending on its size and on climate and altitude=单棵树的size, climate,altitude也可以看做是The yield per acre of coffee berries varies enormously原因。
是有歧义的。
16#
发表于 2016-9-26 13:28:04 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
17#
发表于 2017-4-2 09:54:35 | 只看该作者
zhuang8825 发表于 2013-1-8 01:08
我是不是能理解为夹心修饰错误一般是状语位置的错误,状语放在句子中间可以修饰前也可以修饰后?大部分情况 ...

同意!               
18#
发表于 2017-5-21 18:33:47 | 只看该作者
1369179610 发表于 2013-1-7 10:14
夹心修饰——夹在句子中间的容易导致歧义的修饰辨别方法:1.S,v+ing..., V+O... 句式中现代分词短语约定俗 ...

同意!               
19#
发表于 2018-6-17 19:37:19 | 只看该作者
隔了这么多年了,不知道再回帖有多少人能看到。。二楼说的很对,v+ing大多数时候修饰动作,修饰名词的时候无逗号,所谓夹心修饰其实是,应该是结构上修饰某成分,但内容上却修饰了另一成分。
举例:OG18-780
Unlike the automobile company, whose research was based on crashes involving sport utility vehicles, the research conducted by the insurance company took into account such factors as a driver`s age, sex, and previous driving record .
A company, whose research was based on
B company, which researched
C company, in its research of
D company’s research, having been based on
E company’s research on
答案选E,想说一下D,having been based on是having done,结构上应该修饰后面动词took,但从语义上却修饰了the automobile company,故夹心修饰错误。



20#
发表于 2018-8-2 19:48:19 | 只看该作者
gemmarong 发表于 2018-6-17 19:37
隔了这么多年了,不知道再回帖有多少人能看到。。二楼说的很对,v+ing大多数时候修饰动作,修饰名词的时候 ...

同意!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-25 08:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部