ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2944|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

26篇能源消费的逻辑题答案

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-12-14 19:47:56 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
. 能源消费(逻辑)
Between 1970 and 1980, energy consumption by United States industry peaked and then declined, so that by 1980 total industrial use of energy was below the 1970 level even though total industrial output had grown substantially in the same period. Industry must have instituted highly effective energy conservation measures in those years to have achieved such impressive results.


Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion of the argument?
(A) Many industries switched to the greatest extent possible from high-priced oil to lower-priced alternatives throughout the 1970's.
(B) Total residential energy consumption was higher in the United States in 1980 than it had been in 1970
(C) Many industrial users of energy had paid little attention to energy conservation prior to 1970.
(D) Industrial output grew less rapidly from 1970 to 1980 than it had from 1960 to 1970.
(E) The industries whose production dropped sharply during the 1970's included a disproportionately large number of energy-intensive industries.


到底应该选什么啊
一碰到这种题我就凌乱了
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2013-8-9 05:40:03 | 只看该作者
答案貌似是C
板凳
发表于 2014-8-19 22:17:15 | 只看该作者
就是选C,说的是,由于1980年比1970年的consumption 低了,所以断定:80年在output与70年相当情况下,一定采用了一些高效节能措施,effective conservation measures.
那想要weaken the point,就要说,那些企业压根就没有注意过什么energy conservation的东西。选C。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-9-27 20:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部