OG13 45题(SC)请教

Abcl0653

45. In 1923, the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage
for women and children in the District of Columbia as
unconstitutional, and ruling that it was a form of pricefixing
and, as such, an abridgment of the right of
contract.
(A) the Supreme Court declared a minimum wage
for women and children in the District of
Columbia as unconstitutional, and
(B) the Supreme Court declared as unconstitutional
a minimum wage for women and children in the
District of Columbia, and
(C) the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional a
minimum wage for women and children in the
District of Columbia,
(D) a minimum wage for women and children in the
District of Columbia was declared
unconstitutional by the Supreme Court,
(E) when the Supreme Court declared a minimum
wage for women and children in the District of
Columbia as unconstitutional,


答案是C，对于OG的解释我有一个疑问，就是declare x unconstitutional 为什么要倒装成declare unconsititutional x?
各位大大能否给小弟一点指导？ 感激不尽。

DesmondWang

不是NN，发表一下自己的意见。
我觉得是因为这个declare X unconstituional中的X太长了declared （a minimum wage for women and children in the District of Columbia）unconstitutional这样的表述的话，由于unconstitutional是形容词，有就近修饰名词District of Columbia的嫌疑 。所以排除。

yiqing2012

应该不会有修饰district of columbia的歧义，只是因为太长了~

DesmondWang

一个外国论坛上面的一篇文章说GMAT中，adjective可以作为noun modifier， 是修饰the closest noun, 所以我才觉得有修饰distric of columbia的歧义。
而且，个人觉得adjective可以向前修饰noun，比如：
I want to do  somthings special.
The cat, lazy from overeating, took a snap.(from manhattan)
继续讨论~

yiqing2012

第一句：sth,anything之类的只能后置修饰；
第二句：形容词做伴随状语，不是后置定语~
这道题中unconstitutional只能做宾补，所以不会有修饰歧义。。。

DesmondWang

我对什么宾补之类的专业用语不是很熟，不过基本明白你的意思了，受教了，谢谢啦~

DUKB24

头重脚轻的句子结构？

不太清楚LZ想问的是什么


当名词过于亢长，是会被后置的，方便阅读

waytous

另外，这题不是og13 sc45

wjtwenzi

受教了，正好有同样的疑问~

caroline莲莲

有个V-ing的问题请教大家：
ruling that...的逻辑主语是the Supreme Court, 修饰谓语declare，但是这里是伴随动作还是伴随结果呢？觉得两个都不是很说的通