OG 117 存在另一个平行?

pissunrise

OG 117. George Sand (Aurore Lucile Dupin) was one of the first European writers to consider the rural poor to be legitimate subjects for literature and portray these with sympathy and respect in her novels.

(A) to be legitimate subjects for literature and portray these

(B) should be legitimate subjects for literature and portray these

(C) as being legitimate subjects for literature and portraying them

(D) as if they were legitimate subjects for literature and portray them

(E) legitimate subjects for literature and to portray


答案选E我没有意见,但是有没有可能存在另一种平行: "rural poor legitimate subjects for literature "  and "portray them ...."  即这2个东西的平行?


因此原句就变成 George Sand (Aurore Lucile Dupin) was one of the first European writers to consider the rural poor legitimate subjects for literature
and
George Sand (Aurore Lucile Dupin) was one of the first European writers to consider portraying them(rural poor) with sympathy and respect in her novels.


毕竟原句中没有很清楚的表明 George 已经做了XX ( was one of the first to portray ...)
那么我也就可以认为George是one of the first writers to consider about this issue




这个想法有错么?

TerraceHo

我認為這樣想有問題。

如按照lz所說，consider後面是rural poor legitimate subjects for literature和portraying them平行的話，就是說是concrete noun和simple gerund之間平行。按照manhattan所說，這樣的平行是不允許的。

希望能幫到你^^

flonacui

ls说的对

pissunrise

我認為這樣想有問題。

如按照lz所說，consider後面是rural poor legitimate subjects for literature和portraying them平行的話，就是說是concrete noun和simple gerund之間平行。按照manhattan所說，這樣的平行是不允許的。

希望能幫到你^^

-- by 会员 TerraceHo (2012/11/24 20:50:57)

thx~ 给了我一点启发


the + gerund 是可以作为名词与 其他名词 平行的


如OG13-SC-Q121
“New theoriespropose that catastrophic impacts of asteroids and comets may have causedreversals in the Earth’s magnetic field, the onset of ice ages, splitting apart continents 80 million years ago, and greatvolcanic eruptions.”


A:  splitting apart continents
B: the splitting apart continents
C: split apart continents
D: continents split apart
E: continents that were split apart



其他选项的解释我就不贴了,只贴正确答案B的解释
OG: "the splitting" is a gerund, or noun form, and is properly used in this sentence; it is parallel to the other nouns.




难道是rural poor legitimate subjects for literature这个复合名词跟 "the gerund" 这种noun form 不能平行么?


还是我开始钻牛角尖了 = =

兰心寒

pissunrise 发表于 2012-11-26 16:13
我認為這樣想有問題。如按照lz所說，consider後面是rural poor legitimate subjects for literature和po ...

平行这个问题，我觉得是要看语意的。
先看你举的例子，
New theoriespropose that catastrophic impacts of asteroids and comets may have caused reversals in the Earth’s magnetic field, the onset of ice ages, the splitting apart continents 80 million years ago, and great volcanic eruptions
这句其实并不能佐证你的观点。这个例子里面的平行对象非常的对称，reversal:反转，翻转； onset：袭击的开始，开端； the splitting: 裂开； eruption:爆发。
不知道你有没有注意到，这些都是表示动作的名词，非常对称，如果里面穿插个continent，我反而会觉得很不协调。
撇开语意不讲，至于普通的rule，这里倒是没有打破。一般而言，有名词的动词，其ing形式不能参与名词的平行对称，比如，considering就不能和一些名词平行，因为它有consideration, 但是singing就可以和其他名词平行，因为sing没有名词形式。而且动名词与其他名词平行时多以the v-ing或者her/his/their/its singing的形式出现。
但是我个人觉得，记这些rule比较费脑子，经常还容易把自己弄混淆，我感觉语境语意最关键。