ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1980|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG12-sc-101 求救-commit 、commitment;noun phrases; native speaker

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-11-15 07:21:33 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
<font size="3"><font face="Calibri">101.<u> Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.<br /></u></font></font><br /><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">(A) Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.<br /></font></font><br /><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, <span style="background-color:yellow;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">makes</span></span> missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones <span style="background-color:#ffffff;"><span style="color:#000000;">likely <strong><span style="color:#7030a0;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">when they do appear.<br /></span></span></strong></span></span></font></font><br /><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">(C) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.<br /></span></span></font></font><br /><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">(D) Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.<br /></span></span></font></font><br /><font face="Calibri"><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;"><span style="color:#c00000;"><font size="3">(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that <span style="background-color:lightgrey;">has worked</span> well<strong><span style="background-color:lightgrey;">in the past,</span></strong>is likely to make an executive <span style="background-color:yellow;">miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them</span></font></span><strong><span style="color:#7030a0;"><font size="3"> when they do appear.<br /></font></span></strong></span></span></font><br /><br />网上讨论:<br />A.Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear. <br /><span style="background-color:#e0b800;">* &quot;<span style="color:#ff0000;">heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action</span>&quot; is awkward and difficult to read. (<strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">you may have to be a native speaker to pick up on this, though</span></strong>)</span><br /><br />Noun:&quot;Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action&quot;; the whole clause is: executive Heavy commited to a course of action. <br />Ron,you said the Noun phrase is awkward. but when we need to change a whole clause <em>with Suject, Verb, and Object </em>into a Noun phrase for the context, we only have several ways.<br />1# Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action<br />2# Heavy commitment, by an executive, to a course of action<br />3# Heavy commitment to a course of action by an executive <br />4# executive's Heavy commitment to a course of action <br /><br />4# can be right in GMAT(for example, 'Stephen have researched a phenomenon that most scientists agree is caused by human beings' burning of fossil fuels'; if you need a real gmat question, see OG12 #118), and 3# can also be right in GMAT(Hmmm! actually can be seen everywhere); So i assume that Ron, you will not think them awkward.<br /><br />with repect to 1# and 2#, i don't find any convinced examples for/against the legitimacy of them(except for one in OG 10 #188--<em>'Household cleaning products may not be thought of, by consumers, ashazardous substances' </em>in wrong choice E). it seems likely that as you said, they ARE awkward. <br />Acctully, when first facing the problem, i see the awkward contruct although i am not a native speaker, but not to the exent--&quot;to pick up on this&quot;as a wrong choice; <span style="background-color:#f328ff;">i am not sure whether we can kill the choice whenever finding 1# and 2# contruction in it. <br />Ron, what is your opinion?(are 3# and 4# better than 1# and 2#?)</span>
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-15 07:58:52 | 只看该作者
upup
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-11-15 07:59:12 | 只看该作者
upup!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 小分队

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-27 08:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部