- UID
- 694421
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-11-20
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
|
<font size="3"><font face="Calibri">101.<u> Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.<br /></u></font></font><br /><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">(A) Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.<br /></font></font><br /><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">(B) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, <span style="background-color:yellow;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">makes</span></span> missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones <span style="background-color:#ffffff;"><span style="color:#000000;">likely <strong><span style="color:#7030a0;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">when they do appear.<br /></span></span></strong></span></span></font></font><br /><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">(C) An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.<br /></span></span></font></font><br /><font size="3"><font face="Calibri"><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;">(D) Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.<br /></span></span></font></font><br /><font face="Calibri"><span style="color:#000000;"><span style="background-color:#ffffff;"><span style="color:#c00000;"><font size="3">(E) Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that <span style="background-color:lightgrey;">has worked</span> well<strong><span style="background-color:lightgrey;">in the past,</span></strong>is likely to make an executive <span style="background-color:yellow;">miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them</span></font></span><strong><span style="color:#7030a0;"><font size="3"> when they do appear.<br /></font></span></strong></span></span></font><br /><br />网上讨论:<br />A.Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear. <br /><span style="background-color:#e0b800;">* "<span style="color:#ff0000;">heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action</span>" is awkward and difficult to read. (<strong><span style="color:#ff0000;">you may have to be a native speaker to pick up on this, though</span></strong>)</span><br /><br />Noun:"Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action"; the whole clause is: executive Heavy commited to a course of action. <br />Ron,you said the Noun phrase is awkward. but when we need to change a whole clause <em>with Suject, Verb, and Object </em>into a Noun phrase for the context, we only have several ways.<br />1# Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action<br />2# Heavy commitment, by an executive, to a course of action<br />3# Heavy commitment to a course of action by an executive <br />4# executive's Heavy commitment to a course of action <br /><br />4# can be right in GMAT(for example, 'Stephen have researched a phenomenon that most scientists agree is caused by human beings' burning of fossil fuels'; if you need a real gmat question, see OG12 #118), and 3# can also be right in GMAT(Hmmm! actually can be seen everywhere); So i assume that Ron, you will not think them awkward.<br /><br />with repect to 1# and 2#, i don't find any convinced examples for/against the legitimacy of them(except for one in OG 10 #188--<em>'Household cleaning products may not be thought of, by consumers, ashazardous substances' </em>in wrong choice E). it seems likely that as you said, they ARE awkward. <br />Acctully, when first facing the problem, i see the awkward contruct although i am not a native speaker, but not to the exent--"to pick up on this"as a wrong choice; <span style="background-color:#f328ff;">i am not sure whether we can kill the choice whenever finding 1# and 2# contruction in it. <br />Ron, what is your opinion?(are 3# and 4# better than 1# and 2#?)</span> |
|