之前回复着打了很多很多字,打着打着居然突然明白了PREP中说的到底是什么意思了。。。。 这里不应该像bat那样划分结构,that就是应该就近指代instant才对(另外that/which从句到底能不能跳跃to do来修饰这个问题,我还没有弄明白。。。,但是这里应该是不可以吧。。。),但是因为that前面的beginning be an instant是主系表结构,所以begginning就是instant,这样C和D选项的解释就没什么矛盾了。。。。 而就A of B that/,which的结构而言,我个人的感觉是无论是which还是that应该都有就近修饰的倾向,但不绝对,可以跳跃修饰中心词,所以在A of B that/,which的结构中,that和which应该修饰A或者修饰B都可以,这个不应该作为考点才对。 不知道这样理解对不对,请指正! -- by 会员 yiqing2012 (2012/10/23 8:38:48)
it seems fine to me also, it seems harsh for me if I do not reply your question ( so many thoughts here) you just use the context to determine A of B
this rule applies to all the question there is no hard and fast rule it will be a hopeless attempt to draw an overall conclusion you can use grammatical and logical rule to determine what that is intended to modify if you cannot, the sentence is poorly written -- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/23 9:40:46)
thks~ 我看了很多帖子和句子之后也感觉到没有必要去区分that到底一定会指代哪一个,一般用逻辑判断是对的就可以了。。。
但是我纠结的问题是像bat那样划分句子结构之后,得出that is expanding和to have been an explosive instant一起修饰the beginning of universe是否正确。不知道DUKB你怎么看?
我看了OG12中所有的that和which引导的定语从句,应该还没有可以跳跃像to have been an explosive instant那么长的含动词和名词的结构来修饰前面n.的句子,毕竟这里的that is expanding修饰instant是make sense的,所以是不是应该像prep所说的一样,that is expanding修饰instant会更合理点? |