真是解答的很清晰!懂啦!~
第一个疑问: nope,这个结构在GMAC的理解更倾向为不清晰,错误,如果是that of 代替所有格的话,这个结构的that肯定就没有歧义(但是不觉得这个 所有格的比较就是 绝对性的错误,我会和其他选项作出比较,就是一个split;如果所有格和that of 作出了 split,我更相信GMAC的解释会说这个所有格不清晰,很模糊) 类似这种所有格的不清晰比较的题型可参照: Although people inFrance consume fatty foods at a rate comparable to the United States, theirdeath rates from heart disease are far lower in France.A. people in France consume fatty foods at a rate comparable to the UnitedStates, theirB. people in France and the United States consume fatty foods at about thesame rate, theC. fatty foods are consumed by people in France at a comparable rate to theUnited States's, theirD. the rate of fatty foodsconsumed in France and the United States is about the same, the (B)E. the rate of people consuming fatty foods is about the same in France andthe United States, the (这题的C选项) 第二个问题:你要看逻辑的对等性:A of B like C(如果A和C,B和C都处在了相同的逻辑层面上,可能就会有歧义,没有例子说不清。。。) 第三个问题:yes,u r right
-- by 会员 DUKB24 (2012/10/11 9:17:06)
|