ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1776|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[issue] ISSUE 13 大学多样化课程 求拍各种拍!!

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-9-4 09:52:43 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Universities should require every studentto take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study.
提纲: 大正小负
1.      多样课程可以帮助学生学习其他知识,开阔眼界,释放专业学习的压力。
2.      多样化课程可以帮助学生更好的掌握知识,因为知识本就是相通的,example Nash mathematicians game theory  economic politic
3.      However,多样化课程会加重学生的负担,所以应该将其设置为选修课的形式,既可以促进学生学习,也不会增加压力
Recently, a new issue has been hotlydiscussed that whether the university should require its students to takevarious courses that are outside of their major field. The author assertedthat  various curriculums are needed foruniversity students. I agree with this claim to some extent. Taking a varietyof courses will be salutary for students to gain a more profound understandingof their own major field knowledge and even the world. However, a forcing requirementwill be unnecessary. It may leads to a counterproductive result.
In the first place, students would benefita lot from the variety of courses. Students could get an opportunity to gainknowledge out of their own major field, broaden their horizons, and also givethem a breath from the burdensome study. For example, a student whose majorfield is politics could have artistic courses like opera. Learning opera couldrelease him or her from the heavy pressure of the study. Moreover, it alsoprovides a chance to enhance himself or herself artistic education, which islacking of in the high paced society. In this sense, a various courses are necessaryto some degree.
Variety of courses could do more than what Isaid above. All the knowledge are interrelated as everyone knows. For instance,Nash, a mathematician who get the Noble economic prizes with the other twoco-winners who are also mathematicians, has a great impact on politic andeconomic science because of his game theory. So it will be clear that learninga variety of curriculums could help the university students to make a moredeeply and widely understanding of their major field knowledge and even theworld. We could not imagine that a students of management without knowledge ofpsychology, an anthropology students without knowledge of history and sociology.In this term, various curriculums seems necessary to help students to gain moreachievements in their major field study.
However, a requirement of taking this kindof courses would be counterproductive. Students in the university already havea lot of onerous study task. In addition to taking classes, they have to dosome research, update their knowledge in time, attending different kinds oflectures that may be useful for their learning and life in universities. Sochances are high that an added curriculum would give them more pressure, evendetermine their own field study to the worst. But it does not rule out the necessityof taking some extra courses outside the students’ fields. Universities couldmake the extra courses as a selective courses, students could choose whatevercourses they would like to take. With this method, students would gain moreknowledge without getting extra pressure.
To sum up, I conceive that universities shouldtake a various courses for students without a forcing requirement. The studentscan choose freely what selective courses to study.
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-9-4 22:25:38 | 只看该作者
All the knowledge are interrelated as everyone knows,这个还是多少有些武断,后面也没有支持性的语句。
关于论证部分,我的意见是,分论点后面要有支撑性的语句,而不要有语文作文的惯性,用例子代替自己的分析,在AW中例子不是最重要的,重要的是自己的分析,例子也一般是对自己的分析的一个演绎。
板凳
发表于 2012-9-5 07:56:00 | 只看该作者
第一个里面是释放压力,第三个理由里面是增加了压力。。。
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-5 11:14:38 | 只看该作者
恩,谢谢中人的指点。 我自己也觉得后面直接接上nash的例子不够连贯,有点跳跃!
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-9-5 11:17:06 | 只看该作者
谢谢普渡哥!!这么明显的错误我还写得一点感觉都没有,虽然我本来想的是forcing requirement leads to pressure,但是为了避免说不清楚引起歧义我还是把第一条的释放压力删了吧!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-12-6 01:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部