【新GRE阅读逻辑题10套】中的问题，求解答求讨论！

ee陌墨

一直盼有人能跟我讨论问题，错题不弄懂等于没有做啊。
希望CD的各位G友能帮我解答。有这套题里我刚做到第5套，除了此题，其他都会，也欢迎大家提问。
……………………………………………………………………
练习2的第十题：
10 The town of San Leonardo has recently enacted a law
banning smoking in all restaurants within town limits.
Since many smokers who normally dine in San
Leonardo's restaurants will not want to refrain from
smoking during their meals, San Leonardo's restau-
rants will undoubtedly lose many patrons and con-
siderable income.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to
strengthen the argument above?

(A) Most residents of San Leonardo who eat in res-
taurants are not smokers.

(B) Most smokers who dine in the company of non-
smokers are willing to refrain from smoking
during their meals.

(C) If the law banning smoking in restaurants had
not been enacted, it is likely that a more
stringent law banning smoking in all public
places in San Leonardo would have been
enacted instead.

(D) Prior to the enactment of the law banning
smoking in San Leonardo's restaurant, the
town had a law that required most restaurants
to have nonsmoking sections.

(E) None of the other communities adjacent to San
Leonardo, which have restaurants comparable
to those of San Leonardo, has enacted and
enforces any antismoking legislation

………………………………
………………………………
………………………………
答案是E

ee陌墨

PS：
我选的是D。
我是这么想的：
E选项：别的社区有木有相同政策干我什么事？就算餐馆具有可比性，你也没告诉我在别的社区这种政策是否影响到餐馆的营业啊。
我选D的原因：
在全面禁烟之前，餐馆里有无烟区和有烟区之分，这样吸烟的顾客就愿意到这些餐馆去。
但一旦全面禁烟了，吸烟的顾客如果要吸烟就不去餐馆了，这样才影响餐馆营业。

grewalker

我选B的，如果烟民真的能做到在不准吸烟的地方不吸烟的话。那么SL的income就会降低。。。

ee陌墨

我今天又看了一遍，突然想通为什么了
因为题中的community是个很小的范围，如果这个社区禁烟了那想吸烟的顾客可以去隔壁社区的餐馆吃饭……
就是这么个熊逻辑……OTL

gunxueqiucjw

这逻辑真心拽