arguement 78

xing7

各位 我有个问题不知道该怎么写了78这篇argue里面说 A B俩公司服务保存食物，然后A公司的费用比B公司的费用低一些，但A公司服务下的食物比B公司服务下的食物损失要大
我想说 用性价比来考虑问题， A公司的费用比B公司的费用低很多，特别低，然后A公司损失的比B大， 但性价比来看 还是A更值
这个用英文怎么说 我自己说的好乱啊
the VP said that the A-company’s price charge is considerable low, buthe does not demonstrate the exact price charge. Maybe the cost-effective of A-company is more than B-company, this means that although the lost money of A-company is more than B-company, the cost of A-company is notable lower thanthe latter, and use A-company could save more money.
帮忙修改一下 谢谢各位

katongwangzhe

...新手一个，也许不对啊。。。
Although hiring Company B might cause less damage than Company A,the Price charge of Company B is much higher than company A.So if we take all these factors into account,calculating the cost-to-income-ratio,Company A would be more cost-effective,thus a better choice.

竹林中人

你不必这么去说理，具体描述下会更好。比如，虽然A损失的金额大，但也许总量大，因而不能说B就更有效些