困惑有两个结论的argument应该怎么写？

qqc1991

看argument的时候题目一般都是一个结论，但是今天写了og13的最后一题，发现文中有两个结论，而且基本没有相关性，写的时候很是变扭。不知道有没有高手对这种题有心得？

“During a recent trial period in which government inspections at selected meat-processing plants were more frequent, the amount of bacteria in samples of processed chicken decreased by 50 percent on average from the previous year’s level. If the government were to institute more frequent inspections, the incidence of stomach and intestinal infections throughout the country could thus be cut in half. In the meantime, consumers of Excel Meats should be safe from infection because Excel’s main processing plant has shown more improvement in eliminating bacterial contamination than any other plant cited in the government report.”

这题里，一个结论是 If the government were to institute more frequent inspections, the incidence of stomach and intestinal infections throughout the country could thus be cut in half. 另一个是consumers of Excel Meats should be safe from infection，前后没有什么关系嘛。这是当做两个结论来攻还是找出一个主要结论，另外一个作为副结论。

求指教！

银杏yy

拙见：你说的第一个结论应该可以理解成一个假设或前提吧？这篇文重心在EM这个公司

doreen322

同意楼上，中心在后面，强调EM很安全。政府的监察是作为EM很安全的一个支撑