ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1784|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[语文] 问一道 36套第四套 里面的一个题目

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-7-13 00:51:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
                                                9.  In  the  first  paragraph  of  the  passage,  the  author’s  attitude toward the literary critics mentioned canbest be described as
(A) disparaging

            (B) ironic
(C) facetious
(D) skeptical but resigned(E) disappointed but hopeful

        



我找到的原文里面说
literary  critics’  cavalier  dismissal  of  Woolf’ssocial vision will not withstand scrutiny.


我的理解是文章对W的态度应该是+的呀?  为什么选A呢?


谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-13 00:52:29 | 只看该作者
4/36 第9题

原文在这里

“I  want  to  criticize  the  social  system,  and  to show it at work,  at  its  most  intense.”  Virginia Woolf’s  provocative statement about her intentions in writing Mrs. Dalloway
Line has regularly been ignored by the critics, since it
5 highlights an aspect of her literary interests very different
from the  traditional  picture  of  the  “poetic”  novelist concerned with examining states of reverie and vision and with following the intricate pathways of individual consciousness. But Virginia Woolf was a realistic as well
10 as a poetic novelist, a satirist and social critic as well as a visionary: literary  critics’  cavalier  dismissal  of  Woolf’s social vision will not withstand scrutiny.
In her novels, Woolf is deeply engaged by the questions of how individuals are shaped (or deformed) by
15 their social environments, how historical forces impinge on  people’s  lives,  how class, wealth, and gender help to determine people’s  fates.  Most  of  her  novels  are  rooted in a realistically rendered social setting and in a precise historical time.
板凳
发表于 2012-7-14 12:07:31 | 只看该作者
那句话的意识是说文学批评界对W的social vision 的傲慢的否定是不会经得住严格考查的,所以作者对文学批评的态度是不屑的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-5 11:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部