ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2090|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[题目讨论]GWD26-Q20

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2012-7-8 17:45:05 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
GWD26-Q20

In 1981 children in the United States

spent an averageof slightly less than two and a half hours a week doinghousehold chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.


A.chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hoursa week

B.chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearlysix hours a week

C.chores, whereas nearly six hours a week werespent in 1997

D.chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997

E.chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

为什么D不对呢?请求大牛指教,谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2012-7-8 21:46:54 | 只看该作者
其实最简单的错误就是时间表述。

by+1997...表示在1997年之前
In+1997...表示在1997年的那一年

句意被改变
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2012-7-9 10:19:17 | 只看该作者
明白了!多谢楼上的指点!
地板
发表于 2012-7-19 19:30:40 | 只看该作者
为啥A不对啊
5#
发表于 2012-7-19 22:51:08 | 只看该作者
为啥A不对啊
-- by 会员 戴小真 (2012/7/19 19:30:40)



had 时态错误。。。。
6#
发表于 2012-7-19 22:57:07 | 只看该作者
GWD26-Q20



In 1981 children in the United States



spent an averageof slightly less than two and a half hours a week doinghousehold chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.




A.chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hoursa week



B.chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearlysix hours a week



C.chores, whereas nearly six hours a week werespent in 1997



D.chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997



E.chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

为什么D不对呢?请求大牛指教,谢谢!


-- by 会员 louisehu (2012/7/8 17:45:05)



我看到的D中最大的不对在于句尾分词修饰错误。

“逗号+过去分词”结构中,过去分词是用来修饰其前紧邻的名词的,在题目中是chores;
而选项中的过去分词真正想修饰的确实前面的主句。错了。

---

pp08笔记的181题后有关于分词修饰的解释。
7#
发表于 2012-7-19 23:45:46 | 只看该作者
D选项还有一个很明显的错误,比较对象不合理。
这一选项在把“a figure"和”children in the united states"放在一起比较了。。。
把D选项放在未划线处前面看的会更清楚。“Compared with a figure of....., .....children in the united states spent..."这样是不是就可以很明显的看到比较对象的不合理了?
8#
发表于 2012-8-4 18:57:17 | 只看该作者
为啥A不对啊
-- by 会员 戴小真 (2012/7/19 19:30:40)




had 时态错误。。。。
-- by 会员 jeffery2541 (2012/7/19 22:51:08)




had时态哪里错了呢?  在1997年之前,是过去的过去,怎么不对呢??
9#
发表于 2012-8-4 18:58:52 | 只看该作者
有人说D的compared with是修饰的chores,有人说修饰的是主语,到底修饰的是什么呢,求大家解答啊~~~
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2012-8-14 12:53:12 | 只看该作者
对于D,我重新想了一下,可能是比较点不对。因为前面一句并没有提到figure,或者figure同类型的词;后面如果比较,最好是much more time then they did in the past之类的句子;而且the figure of XXXhours a week有种限定figure的比较,这种of词组prep08里面似乎有提到。所以D不对吧。。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-26 22:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部