ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: juliaPL
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD 13-30 并非重复发问

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2007-5-2 18:04:00 | 只看该作者
支持A
22#
发表于 2007-8-13 21:02:00 | 只看该作者
用google搜到的近似这句话的原文,出自一则新闻报道:For the first time in the modern era, non- Hispanic
whites are officially a minority in California, amounting to a little
less than half the population of the most populous state, compared with
nearly three-quarters only a decade ago, according to census figures
released today.

我想A错在amounts,应为amount.似乎逻辑which的先行词应该是
non- Hispanic
whites。像which这样总容易犯指代不清毛病的,最好就用分词作定语吧
23#
发表于 2007-8-13 22:27:00 | 只看该作者

同意

以下是引用anyname在2005-4-28 14:03:00的发言:

In A, "which" 修饰混淆;另外,nearly three-quarters only a decade ago中的only会不会混淆成修饰three-quarters呢?这种夹心修饰,是不是去掉也好?

同意

24#
发表于 2008-2-16 13:20:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用oceanalma在2005-10-10 19:10:00的发言:
很想知道
  1. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters a decade ago

中的down.......是什么成份,amounting.....是伴随,好像这个down也是个伴随吗,怎么连个伴随,好不惯阿

请指教

同问,请指教!!!谢谢!!!
25#
发表于 2008-9-17 16:40:00 | 只看该作者
我完全因为only坚定地排除了D而选了A。而且在which/amounting的问题上,我仔细研究了下,认为A里的which跳跃修饰了a minority.

For the first time in the modern era, non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority in California, which amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters only a decade ago.

我认为,如果没有这个the state的出现,那么which就可能修饰a minority又可能修饰California。但是有了这个the state,可以确定which是跳跃修饰a minority。

我们试将which替换为California:


For the first time in the modern era, non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority in California, California amounts to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters only a decade ago.

“California amounts to a little less than half the population of the state”明显不通。所以which在这里跳跃修饰a minority是绝对成立的。

---------------
但看了前人的讨论,觉得only确实可以既修饰three-quaters,又可以修饰a decade ago。 但也没必要删除吧。。。。。。。。。

26#
发表于 2008-9-21 16:47:00 | 只看该作者
最近在prep看到一道题,类似于这个的结果,说in California是修饰核心词的,所以which可以跳跃修饰a minority
27#
发表于 2008-10-2 15:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用oceanalma在2005-10-10 19:10:00的发言:
很想知道
  1. amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters a decade ago

中的down.......是什么成份,amounting.....是伴随,好像这个down也是个伴随吗,怎么连个伴随,好不惯阿

请指教

时隔三年,同问此惑...

UP...

28#
发表于 2009-2-8 06:02:00 | 只看该作者
删除原句中修饰不清的词,这样也可以的。。。。。。受教了。
29#
发表于 2009-7-10 21:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用oceanalma在2005-10-10 19:10:00的发言:
很想知道
  1. For the first time in the modern era, non-Hispanic Whites are officially a minority in California, amounting to a little less than half the population of the state, down from nearly three-quarters a decade ago.

中的down.......是什么成份,amounting.....是伴随,好像这个down也是个伴随吗,怎么连个伴随,好不惯阿

请指教

个人观点:

我觉得down from nearly three-quaters a decade ago, 也是伴随修饰主句中的are,逻辑主语是non-Hispanic Whites. 在连接非完整主谓(即主语)时,and不是必须的。

例如:GWD3-Q39Minivans, carrying as many as seven passengers, compared with most sport utility vehicles, cost less get better gas mileage, allow passengers to get in and out more easily, and have a smoother ride.加粗部分都是修饰Minivans,但是并没有连词and。

所以and不是检验非完整主谓结构并列的绝对标准。

open to discuss.

30#
发表于 2009-7-20 12:48:00 | 只看该作者
奇怪,怎么搜索到的都看不多回复阿,哪里要设置吗?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-10 02:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部