issue140 求拍!!谢谢啦!!

peepul

Issue140: Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student’s field of study. Others believe that universities should not force student to take any courses other than those that will help prepare them for jobs in their chosen fields.
提纲:我的观点:两种观点都很极端,实施起来有困难,一旦真的实施,会造成很多不良后果
1.学校为必能保质保量的开设各种课程;学生的时间和精力有限,未必能学习各种课程;太多的课程会导致学生厌学,或者耽误了专业课程的研究学习
2.同样的,将就业前景作为选择课程的标准也是不合理的:社会高度分工,产业转型迅速,无法预测四年后能带来收益的专业是什么,即使预测到了,也会造成资源浪费,失业人口增加和新兴产业发展困难等问题
3.只有将宽泛的知识基础和学生的兴趣结合起来,进而为就业提供学则,教育才能完成促进个人和社会发展的使命.

• It has been a complex and controversial issue that which should be preferred in college curriculum, a profound basis of diverse course or a solid foundation for future career? Based on different background and respective, people hold even opposite standpoint, as claimed by the author: some tend to stress the wide range of knowledge while some others prefer the applicability of the course in the future. In my point of view, both proposals are biased to some extent. In stead of choosing one from the two, it is more advisable to cooperate and balance between the two, because the two are not exclusive.
  
• One reason for my view is that, it costs o lot to request every student to take various kinds of courses. Firstly, not every university or college can provide a great quantity of courses with assurance of the quality, nor need they. Secondly, it is impossible for the undergraduates to learn all kind of courses outside their major, for the limitation of time and ability. Thirdly, it is entire possible that the requirement of variety of courses will lead to weariness of study, which will counterproductive inhibits further learning. For these considerations, it is unreasonable to overemphasize the too wide range of courses. What’s more, if the proposal is followed, the colleges and universities will lost their distinctiveness and personality; the students will lost their essential specialization and delving in their field; even, the undergraduates will lost their personality and creativity with an indiscriminate curriculum. For these considerations, it is unreasonable to overemphasize the too wide range of courses.
  
• However, it is another extremity to limit the curriculum to the courses that benefit the future career. Firstly, with the development in refinement of the division and in intensification in interdependent of the cross of disciplines, it is unpredictable which profession will be more profitable in four years. Secondly, even assuming that the ridiculous recommendation is followed, numerous students flush into several confined majors, which appears to be profitable in the following years, labor and resource surpluses will be inevitable. What’s more the concentration in several avocations will lead to impediment of newly developing fields. If these scenarios come into reality, college education would be a failure.
  
• Actually by finding a balance, it is feasible to cooperate knowledge diversity with occupational planning, because in the phase of college education, students always major in areas which are interesting to them. In fact, interest is the best motivation and best guidance. So by taking the two factors into consideration, several enjoyable courses outside the major will benefit the students most while waste of resources and weariness of study will be also avoided. What’s more, students will be educated to have capacities in every practical progress and the ability to ability for future personal fulfillment.
  
• In sum, only when universities balance the factor of diversified knowledge basis and career preparation, education will achieve it’s mission to transfigure both the individuals and the society.
  

普渡哥

我觉得有点矛盾。作者说要把宽泛的知识基础和学生的兴趣结合起来,进而为就业提供学则,教育才能完成促进个人和社会发展的使命， 而在第一点里，作者又说：学校为必能保质保量的开设各种课程;学生的时间和精力有限,未必能学习各种课程;太多的课程会导致学生厌学,或者耽误了专业课程的研究学习，明显是否定学习宽泛的知识。

作者最后总结说要把宽泛知识和学生兴趣结合起来，怎么结合？作者否定了两个论点，所以要建立自己的论点，你最后的一句话没有说服力。

peepul

谢谢版主 其实这篇文章我就是觉得结构很难把握好……我觉得两个提议结合一下，开一部分课而不是各种各样的，学生自主选择这些课程，然后在选择专业进行研究。自己不太会表达清楚啊！

peepul

大家帮我分析一下这篇文章结构怎么控制啊!