og226

biss33 · 发表于 2005-7-11 23:20:00

up up

请nn确认

jennyb · 发表于 2005-7-19 09:30:00

丑得老婆哭 · 发表于 2005-7-24 17:16:00

当作固定用法嘛：

credit(v.认为) sth/sb. with having had some effect：认为sth/sb.曾经做了对…有影响的事

give credit（n.荣誉） to sth for having had some effect

oceanalma · 发表于 2005-9-16 10:34:00

这个也太死记硬背了吧，完全没有理解阿，having had到底什么东西啊？

盼啊盼啊，指点！！！

wingkim · 发表于 2005-11-4 22:40:00

金山词霸有这样的解释：

credit v. 归(功于某人)(to); 赞颂(with);

有下面的例句：

1、 credit the invention to him. 把这项发明归功于他。

2、He is credited with the invention. 他因为这项发明备受赞颂。

两句表达的意思基本一样。句子1主动用to，句子2被动用with，估计这样的用法是基于to跟with的含义不同，当然也可能是因为主动、被动的区别导致含义转变。不过两者都是介词，后面只能接名词做宾语。

在这里having had是完成式的动名词吧。

milanforever · 发表于 2005-12-5 08:43:00

credit sb. with having done sth.

"having done sth" 这是现在分词的完成时。用来表示分词的动作发生于主句谓语动作之前。

这里"with having done sth"的句子成分是宾补，它与sb.一道做credit的复合宾语。

ETS的另一个规则：“现在分词完成时不作定语“ 在这里不适用。

superdino · 发表于 2006-2-13 22:30:00

The verb form having had is used appropriately in choice A to indicate action that occurred prior to action expressed in the simple past tense--that is, to indicate that African art had influenced Picasso before he credited it with having done so.

为什么现完可以表示比过去时前的时间？？继续前面的问题

还有OG261中B，解释也是说HAVING BEEN..表示比过去时前，难道HAVING BEEN都有这效果？它不是现分？

261. Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940. author Bharati Mukherjee has lived in England and Canada, and first came to the United States in 1961 to study at the Iowa Writers' Workshop.

(A) Being a United States citizen since 1988 and born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee has

(B) Having been a United States citizen since 1988, she was born in Calcutta in 1940; author Bharati Mukherjee

(C) Born in Calcutta in 1940, author Bharati Mukherjee became a United States citizen in 1988; she has

(D) Being born in Calcutta in 1940 and having been a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

(E) Having been born in Calcutta in 1940 and being a United States citizen since 1988, author Bharati Mukherjee

C is best. The first clause presents its information clearly and in logical sequence. The use of a semicolon to set apart the remaining information further assists the clarity of the sentence. In A, the phrase Being... and born violates parallelism and oddly presents its information in reverse chronological order. Choice B illogically suggests that upon her birth in 1940, Mukherjee had already been a United States citizen since 1988. In D and E, the use of progressive forms (Being born, having been. Having been born, and being) implies continuous action, a notion that is not appropriate to the facts being presented. Also, these forms do not establish a logical time sequence, suggesting, for example, that Mukherjee had been a United States citizen before she lived in England and Canada and first came to the United States.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-2-13 22:32:17编辑过]

titatita · 发表于 2006-2-14 20:02:00

以下是引用superdino在2006-2-13 22:30:00的发言：