先说在前面:看你这么着急求助,我觉得最好的方法就是放弃verb tense,听Ron的话 http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-689762-1-1.html 以下我简单说,如果你不能理解,建议你forget about verb tense. OG86 时态错误是因为"which increased"应该是"which have increased",你要考虑前后文的联系。前面说are evident就定义了这个reference frame,后面补充说明,那么肯定是观测者位于这个reference frame上的,所以要用have increased. 后面的相应地改,after doing最straightforward. Again, 不用verb tense,"it"那个agreement的错误最直接最绝对。 Manhattan说的是对的。 OG123, 有一个逻辑问题不知道你是否认同:如果大的方向都错了(大错特错),那么小的错误就不计了。 就好比走路,本来要往北走,结果你往南走,那难道老师还该纠正你说:“你选的这条路不好,这条路弯弯曲曲的,或者这条路堵车”? 同样的道理,选项(A)就是个run-on sentence,那么严重的问题,直接咔嚓。就说压根就不能两个s-v那么连着,那你还管verbal tense干吗?OG不提也罢,你也不用管了。 -- by 会员 babybearmm (2012/6/18 11:49:25)
baby姐姐实在不好意思再问你这道问题,因为你这里讲了,日记里也讲了...可是我还是有点小疑惑呀...还希望baby姐姐能解答一下: This sentence describes two sequentially ordered indicators by which the results of a company’s cost cutting measures can be seen. The first indicator to be identified, a 5 percent increase in profits, occurred after the indicator mentioned next.The sentence therefore needs to clarify the sequence by presenting the first-identified indicator in a clause with a verb tense that indicates a later time period than the verb tense in the clause presenting the second-identified indicator. 然后对正确答案C,og的解答是: The verb tenses clearly indicate the sequence of events. 我的问题是:(1)只有现在完成时有clarify the sequence 的功能么?既然Ron在这里说 increased 和 have increased 都可以,是不是说这两者都有clarify the sequence 的功能呢?? (2)og,75,现在完成时的用法:One use of the present perfect is to express a future action that will be completed before another future action.
75.A proposal has been made to trim the horns from rhinoceroses to discourage poachers; the question is whether tourists will continue to visit game parks to see rhinoceroses once the animals’horns have been trimmed. 和这里的有关系么?有点混乱了....
先谢谢姐姐了~~
|