ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: bryan0806
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD6-22

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2005-10-9 18:15:00 | 只看该作者

very reluctant to 是形容词做壮语。个人意见请参考。

22#
发表于 2005-10-14 15:34:00 | 只看该作者
I can't agree with you more
23#
发表于 2005-10-23 14:10:00 | 只看该作者
The reason why he did so. Sometimes why could be replaced by that.
24#
发表于 2005-12-20 14:12:00 | 只看该作者

D的主语是什么?


25#
发表于 2006-3-30 15:20:00 | 只看该作者
E 很清楚
26#
发表于 2006-4-7 00:03:00 | 只看该作者
thanks~
[此贴子已经被作者于2006-4-7 0:07:53编辑过]
27#
发表于 2006-8-17 22:24:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ethyl在2005-5-23 9:02:00的发言:

补充:

A:run-on sentence

B:was attempting 时态不对;being very reluctant 不好,而且有squinting modifier之嫌

C:was attempting 时态不对;since …so violated the paradigm

D:改变句子结构,重心转移

E:正确;BTW,very reluctant不能当独立主格吗?

好棒!这么一说清楚多了,A项VS E项,主要是在逗号前后的两个部分,

A:前后都是完整主谓的句子,therefore副词,不能连接

E:只有后面的部分是完整句,不出现句子间需要连词连接的问题

www.m-w.com

Function: adverb
1 a
        : for that reason : CONSEQUENTLY
        b
        : because of that c
        : on that ground
2
        : to that end

28#
发表于 2006-9-8 16:19:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用丑得老婆哭在2005-9-10 20:47:00的发言:

我觉得不是独立主格结构,因为在reluctant前面没有名词或是代词等做逻辑主语。

这个结构更象是过去分词放句首的用法,因为过去分词在某种意义上演变为了形容词,而这里是形容词放句首,这两种用法很象;我认为大家应该注意reluctant to........和主句主语在逻辑上是否搭配,即charles lindvergh was very reluctant to。。。。

不知大家理解我意思没

29#
发表于 2006-10-10 12:55:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Avantasia在2005-5-9 13:21:00的发言:

高级问题!

句子的逻辑意思确实需要一个因果关系, OG里面似乎只有提到过分词可以表达出这种效果, 但是形容词的成份就不理解了, 查了些语法资料也没有得到确切的答案, 不知道大家有什么看法, 请教了.

 同问

30#
发表于 2006-10-10 13:03:00 | 只看该作者

Charles Lindbergh, for his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore refused to carry even a pound of mail, despite being offered $1,000 to do so.

 

  1. Charles Lindbergh,
                            for
    his attempt at a solo transatlantic flight, was very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he therefore
  2. When Charles Lindbergh was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, being very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane, he
  3. Since he was very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he was attempting his solo transatlantic flight, so Charles Lindbergh
  4. Being very reluctant to carry any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight was the reason that Charles Lindbergh
  5. Very reluctant to have any extra weight on his plane when he attempted his solo transatlantic flight, Charles Lindbergh

A选项能否理解为:"for" , "therefore"   redundant?  不是太清楚

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-22 13:46
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部